(Video) Pfister Q&A at UCLA
Posted: March 9th, 2011, 10:58 am
Nolan Fans
Discussion forums for the premiere fan community for and by fans of film director Christopher Nolan.
http://www.nolanfans.com/forums/
(Video) Pfister Q&A at UCLA
Page 1 of 4
(Video) Pfister Q&A at UCLA
Posted: March 9th, 2011, 11:12 am
Awesome stuff, thanks for the post!
(Video) Pfister Q&A at UCLA
Posted: March 10th, 2011, 1:36 am
That was really fantastic. Usually learn at least a few things you hadn't before with each of these Wally interviews.
(Video) Pfister Q&A at UCLA
Posted: March 10th, 2011, 11:04 pm
Shame Wally had that experience with the Phantom. Certainly seems to be basing most of his opinions on that experience, read another brief thing about him in Kodak mag. Tsk tsk. Get your hands on an ALEXA WALLY! Look what it did to Deakins!
(Video) Pfister Q&A at UCLA
Posted: March 10th, 2011, 11:09 pm
But Wally is better then Deakins.RomanM wrote:Shame Wally had that experience with the Phantom. Certainly seems to be basing most of his opinions on that experience, read another brief thing about him in Kodak mag. Tsk tsk. Get your hands on an ALEXA WALLY! Look what it did to Deakins!
(Video) Pfister Q&A at UCLA
Posted: March 10th, 2011, 11:14 pm
LMFAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!allstarr55js wrote:But Wally is better then Deakins.RomanM wrote:Shame Wally had that experience with the Phantom. Certainly seems to be basing most of his opinions on that experience, read another brief thing about him in Kodak mag. Tsk tsk. Get your hands on an ALEXA WALLY! Look what it did to Deakins!
AHHHH!!! LMAOOO! Thanks for the laugh kiddo!
(Video) Pfister Q&A at UCLA
Posted: March 10th, 2011, 11:14 pm
First off, I disagree. Secondly, what the hell does that have to do with anything?But Wally is better then Deakins.
Get your hands on an ALEXA WALLY! Look what it did to Deakins!
Why? For better low light or... why would you want him to use the ALEXA?
(Video) Pfister Q&A at UCLA
Posted: March 10th, 2011, 11:15 pm
Because the Phantom is not the camera to use to judge digital cinematography against? LOL come on Crazy.Crazy Eight wrote:First off, I disagree. Secondly, what the hell does that have to do with anything?But Wally is better then Deakins.
Get your hands on an ALEXA WALLY! Look what it did to Deakins!
Why? For better low light or... why would you want him to use the ALEXA?
(Video) Pfister Q&A at UCLA
Posted: March 10th, 2011, 11:36 pm
It is not that funny. Wally has this Deakins does not.LMFAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
AHHHH!!! LMAOOO! Thanks for the laugh kiddo!
Of course you do.First off, I disagree.
(Video) Pfister Q&A at UCLA
Posted: March 10th, 2011, 11:43 pm
It is not that funny. Wally has this Deakins does not.
When did you start sucking the Academy's dick? Deakin's had 9 nomination by the way, including two in the same year. He's been robbed so many times...
My bad. I thought you were suggesting he should replace his Anamorphic 35mm get up for the ALEXA.Because the Phantom is not the camera to use to judge digital cinematography against? LOL come on Crazy.