Loading...
NF: Nolan Fans
A place for more serious off-topic discussion and debates.

LGBT Rights

Posts: 9047
Fernando wrote:Definitely. At the gym there was this old lady with a trainer, watching coverage on Obama's pro-gay statement. She goes "It's dangerous. Gays will multiply and everyone'll be gay, then there'll be no more people." :facepalm:

Holy shit, I hadn't thought of that before. :think:

This old lady might be onto something.
Posts: 1027
Location: in a dream
Fernando wrote:Definitely. At the gym there was this old lady with a trainer, watching coverage on Obama's pro-gay statement. She goes "It's dangerous. Gays will multiply and everyone'll be gay, then there'll be no more people." :facepalm:

Damn it, she found out about the plan. As someone who gay, the plan is to convert everybody to be gay and then anarchy will be introduce finally the Earth will be destroyed.
Posts: 10140
Image

Your heterosexuality will be your downfall.
Posts: 1027
Location: in a dream
A rainbow will rise.
Posts: 13
Crazy Eight wrote:I believe all love should be treated equal and without prejudice.


So a sexual bond between a twelve year old girl and a forty year old man shouldn't be discriminated against? And no, I'm not asking for a "but she's not old enough for it to count" nonsense response, either. Most people will never be mature enough for it "count" by that logic, thus bringing you back to square one.

P.S. I'm not relating this to gays; just addressing your individual message.

...A few months late. I'm not used to sites where threads last this long.
Posts: 10231
Location: Northwest
President-Evil wrote:
Crazy Eight wrote:I believe all love should be treated equal and without prejudice.


So a sexual bond between a twelve year old girl and a forty year old man shouldn't be discriminated against? And no, I'm not asking for a "but she's not old enough for it to count" nonsense response, either. Most people will never be mature enough for it "count" by that logic, thus bringing you back to square one.

P.S. I'm not relating this to gays; just addressing your individual message.

...A few months late. I'm not used to sites where threads last this long.


...I assumed the reader of my quoted remark would be intelligent enough to recognize the obvious limitations of my usage of the word "all". Perhaps next time instead of assuming that someone would pick up on the obvious, I will spell it out. A 12 year old doesn't have the mental maturity to distinguish what sexual love is, a 40 year old, excuse me, the average, typical 40 year old, does. But, I'll clarify my original statement to meet your useless, petty, semantic driven specifications.

"I believe all love shared between two consenting, adult individuals (humans) should be treated equal and without prejudice."

Better?
Posts: 1141
Location: United States
Lmao, that is the same shit I have to say to my parents/friends when they go "What's next? Marriage for pedophiles and toddlers?"

The bestiality/pedophilic comparisons are so biast and stupid. Obviously gay relationships, when both sides are consenting (almost always the case), are the same as (and even sonetimes more fruitful than) any straight one.
Zez
Posts: 153
Just put all the gays on an island. They'll all die out eventually.
Posts: 4559
Location: India
Fernando wrote:Image

:clap:

http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.co ... -in-polls/

Glad to see the world is getting over this.


Sorry to nitpick, but the United States of America is not "the world". :roll:

Zez wrote:Just put all the gays on an island. They'll all die out eventually.


If this is meant to be a joke, it is in extremely poor taste. :facepalm:

And guys, there was a time when the Catholic Church conducted same sex marriages. Surprised? Read this post by J. Michael Straczynski:

The interesting thing about watching the debate about same-sex marriage, especially the declaration by many that marriage has always been a Christian family tradition, is that so many of these folks seem not to have an actual grasp of church history.

Leaving aside for a moment the fact that same-sex marriages were routinely conducted by the Catholic Church for nearly three hundred years, from the 10th to the 12th centuries under what was variously termed “the Office of Same-Sex Union” or the “Order for Uniting Two Men”, what’s more compelling is what the Church felt about marriage between a man and woman for the first nine hundred years of its existence.

Basically, they were against it. Marriage created issues of property that could potentially be inherited by offspring rather than granted to the church or seized by lords in the absence of an heir. Marriage was considered by many of Christendom’s brightest lights to be something vile and repugnant. Quintus Septimius Florens Tertullianus (160-225 AD), one of the most regarded Christian writers of his age, often derided marriage, saying that it “consists essentially in fornication.” Thascius Caecilius Cyprianus, the Bishop of Carthage, believed that marriage and childbirth was no longer necessary since the world was now full and ready for Christ’s return.

Consequently, for over eight hundred years the Church refused to have anything to do with marriage. It refused to allow marriages to take place on church grounds and prohibited members of the clergy from taking part in marriage ceremonies outside church grounds. They were to be performed strictly according to local customs without Church recognition, sanction or involvement.

It was only during the late 9th century that the Catholic Church, under pressure from followers, finally began to recognize marriage as a sacrament to be included in the list of other church rituals. But even then, it was considered a second-rate “lesser sacrament,” a poor cousin to the other, more important sacraments such as Baptism, Confirmation and the Holy Orders. It wasn’t until the Council of Trent in 1547 that marriage was finally accorded equal status with the other sacraments. (Ironically, many of the arguments raised at Trent against including marriage with the other sacraments were similar to the arguments being made against same-sex marriage today.)

So the next time you hear someone talking about marriage between a man and woman being a Christian tradition, after you mention the same-sex marriages of the 10th-12 centuries, remind them that conventional marriage, marriage between a man and a woman, was derided, ignored, prohibited, diminished or dismissed by the church for ONE THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED AND FORTY SEVEN YEARS.

Then sit back and enjoy the ruffled-feather symphony, knowing that history and the facts are on your side.
Last edited by oracle86 on Sat May 19, 2012 10:41 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Posts: 1141
Location: United States
oracle86 wrote:Sorry to nitpick, but the United States of America is not "the world". :roll:


Oh :facepalm:
I was just excited, lol.
← Previous page Next page →
← Return to World Affairs & Philosophy
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest.