http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/15/movie ... E_BRF.html

This seems hypocritical coming from a film that was against corporations and the corporate way of thinking. But somehow it's okay to re-release it because there will be new scenes.

I'm not going to see it. Will you guys see it if it does get a re-release?

James Cameron thinks Avatar could have made a "couple hundred million dollars" more had Alice in Wonderland not been released? LOL.

apw wrote:James Cameron thinks Avatar could have made a "couple hundred million dollars" more had Alice in Wonderland not been released? LOL.

I know. He's a true genius!

I couldn't sit through the entire duration of the film. More scenes will only add to the boredom.

It made a lot of money in it's initial run. Not really surprising.

James Cameron seems like he's butthurt.

He also plans to re-release TItanic in 3d for 2012.
Money never sleeps.

natalie wrote:He also plans to re-release TItanic in 3d for 2012.
Money never sleeps.

Yea...not seeing that either. Was going to cause I didn't see it in 1997, but I don't want to fling more cash at James right now. His ego is bothering me.

no i wouldn't go. the only admirable thing about avatar are its visuals, that's it

Abbadon wrote:no i wouldn't go. the only admirable thing about avatar are its visuals, that's it

Agreed, I felt the acting and the story could have been way better.