What was the last movie you've watched? II

All non-Nolan related film, tv, and streaming discussions.
User avatar
Posts: 21411
Joined: June 2010
Location: All-Hail Master Virgo, Censor of NolanFans
Vader182 wrote:Warrior-

Fucking amazing and heart-wrenching performances that give life to an overly cliched screenplay with terrible editing and direction. Fights were sloppy. While I couldn't get over how awful ..much of the film is objectively, the performances made it incredibly moving and powerful.

No idea what I give it.

-Vader
I approve. :lol:

User avatar
Posts: 13944
Joined: June 2009
Location: La La Land
Jurassic Park -- 83/100

Posts: 13622
Joined: June 2009
Location: Florida
X-Men: First 7/10

7 out of 10 rating mostly for the god sexy bromance between Magneto and Professor X. And that awesome scene where he stabs the dude and then gets the knife back with his powers. :tooexcited:

User avatar
Posts: 43129
Joined: May 2010
Vader182 wrote:Warrior-
terrible editing and direction. While I couldn't get over how awful
-Vader
Your extreme exaggeration makes your reviews phony and not taken seriously.

User avatar
Posts: 4533
Joined: June 2011
Location: Lost Angeles
chee wrote:X-Men: First Class
that awesome scene where he stabs the dude and then gets the knife back with his powers. :tooexcited:
:clap:

Magneto had some pretty awesome scenes in the movie.
Allstar wrote:
Vader182 wrote:Warrior-
terrible editing and direction. While I couldn't get over how awful
-Vader
Your extreme exaggeration makes your reviews phony and not taken seriously.

We all know if you don't think this was better then The Dark Knight then you're trolling. i.e. Vader

User avatar
Posts: 20188
Joined: June 2010
Location: The White City
Allstar wrote:
Vader182 wrote:Warrior-
terrible editing and direction. While I couldn't get over how awful
-Vader
Your extreme exaggeration makes your reviews phony and not taken seriously.
I know you're trolling, but I didn't realize the word 'terrible' was 'extreme exaggeration', nor did I realize that about 'sloppy', and those are two complaints not uncommon on this site and from loads of people in general. If you're going to troll someone, at least attempt being half clever about it instead of just blatantly saying random inflammatory things.

-Vader

User avatar
Posts: 43129
Joined: May 2010
Vader182 wrote:
Allstar wrote:
Your extreme exaggeration makes your reviews phony and not taken seriously.
I know you're trolling, but I didn't realize the word 'terrible' was 'extreme exaggeration', nor did I realize that about 'sloppy', and those are two complaints not uncommon on this site and from loads of people in general. If you're going to troll someone, at least attempt being half clever about it instead of just blatantly saying random inflammatory things.

-Vader
I am not trolling, saying the directing is terrible and the film is awful mostly without giving a single reason why is completely absurd and something I refuse to take seriously.

User avatar
Posts: 13506
Joined: February 2011
Blade Runner (1982)
Rating: 9.5/10
Personal Interest's Rate: 9.6/10

Third fav of all time

-------------------------------------------

The Prestige (2006)
Rating: 9.4/10
Personal Interest's Rate: 9.6/10

Fourth fav of all time

User avatar
Posts: 17534
Joined: May 2011
mastervirgo wrote:Blade Runner (1982)
Rating: 9.5/10
Personal Interest's Rate: 9.6/10

Second fav of all time

-------------------------------------------

The Prestige (2006)
Rating: 9.4/10
Personal Interest's Rate: 9.6/10

Fourth fav of all time
Out of curiosity, what's number 1 and 3?
"It doesn't matter how you get knocked down in life because that's going to happen. All that matters is you gotta get up."

User avatar
Posts: 13506
Joined: February 2011
DoubleD wrote:Out of curiosity, what's number 1 and 3?
I made a mistake. Blade Runner is my third favorite.

1. Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King (2003)
Rating: 9.5/10
PIR: 9.7/10

2. A Clockwork Orange (1971)
Rating: 9.7/10
PIR: 9.7/10

Locked