Nolan Fans

RyanRises wrote:Why exactly did the film suck?

My swift but to the point thoughts on it;

http://www.nolanfans.com/forums/viewtop ... start=6420

Film didn't SUCK, but it definitely wasn't Eastwood's best. I'd probably give it a 7.5 or 8, though it's been quite a while since I've seen it. Leo is great, though, no one's wrong about that.

BroskiSabor wrote:Film didn't SUCK, but it definitely wasn't Eastwood's best. I'd probably give it a 7.5 or 8, though it's been quite a while since I've seen it. Leo is great, though, no one's wrong about that.

Yeah thats better put than I said. It was by no means a bad movie, it just didn't live up to its potential.

Hammer was also fantastic.

RyanRises wrote:Hammer was also fantastic.

because he screamed?

Dream-Xtractor wrote:Leo was excellent.

But the film sucked.

Not enough explosions?

IWatchFilmsNotMovies wrote:

Dream-Xtractor wrote:Leo was excellent.

But the film sucked.

Not enough explosions?

RyanRises wrote:
/sorryforbump