Page 3 of 143
Re: Untitled Joker film (Todd Philips, Martin Scorsese)
Posted: August 23rd, 2017, 8:24 am
by Willem
Will Poulter for Joker please
Edit: sorry for 10th post m4
Re: Untitled Joker film (Todd Philips, Martin Scorsese)
Posted: August 23rd, 2017, 11:00 am
by Artemis
So DCEU, DCAU, DCTV, and now a DC Elseworlds universe separate from the DCEU.
I'm not onboard with this. Maybe instead of having one shared universe, DC should have just made one off movies all this time.
Re: Untitled Joker film (Todd Philips, Martin Scorsese)
Posted: August 23rd, 2017, 11:58 am
by Disney+'s solo2001
akv1984 wrote:So DCEU, DCAU, DCTV, and now a DC Elseworlds universe separate from the DCEU.
im taking a break from the forum for a week after reading this sentence
Re: Untitled Joker film (Todd Philips, Martin Scorsese)
Posted: August 23rd, 2017, 12:35 pm
by Pratham
mchekhov 2: Chek Harder wrote:akv1984 wrote:So DCEU, DCAU, DCTV, and now a DC Elseworlds universe separate from the DCEU.
im taking a break from the forum for a week after reading this sentence
and i guess dc is going to flashpoint elseworlds characters if those movies are successful and integrate them in dceu
don't make it a month solo.
Re: Untitled Joker film (Todd Philips, Martin Scorsese)
Posted: August 23rd, 2017, 2:16 pm
by shauner111
m4st4 wrote:I just realized... specifically mentioned 80s setting means continuous support of Scarface Joker. Fuck this.
Re: Untitled Joker film (Todd Philips, Martin Scorsese)
Posted: August 23rd, 2017, 2:17 pm
by Nomis
Will Poulter would certainly be interesting as the Joker
Re: Untitled Joker film (Todd Philips, Martin Scorsese)
Posted: August 23rd, 2017, 3:47 pm
by Artemis
What if all this DC stuff is a ploy from Warner Bros. to try to get more content to put on their DC exclusive streaming service?
As of right now, they don't have nearly enough content to justify a stand alone streaming service just for one brand. So they gotta churn out more stuff for it.
These Elseworld movies might not even be released in theaters. It will just go straight to stream.
Re: Untitled Joker film (Todd Philips, Martin Scorsese)
Posted: August 23rd, 2017, 4:18 pm
by Cilogy
Nomis wrote:Will Poulter would certainly be interesting as the Joker
well shit, Poulter would have been better than Leto
Re: Untitled Joker film (Todd Philips, Martin Scorsese)
Posted: August 23rd, 2017, 4:31 pm
by m4st4
What, as edgy gangsta with 'damaged' tattooed on his forehead? Son nobody elevates that bullshit. Ayer writes like a high schooler. Leto went for the prize but it was a landmine.
Re: Untitled Joker film (Todd Philips, Martin Scorsese)
Posted: August 23rd, 2017, 5:30 pm
by LelekPL
m4st4 wrote:What, as edgy gangsta with 'damaged' tattooed on his forehead? Son nobody elevates that bullshit. Ayer writes like a high schooler. Leto went for the prize but it was a landmine.
Yeah, I'd still say Leto is the better actor than Poulter and he's definitely a leading man material, whereas Poulter not so much... but he's also very unlikable. Obviously I don't know the guy but there's just something about him that annoys me (and not only me). Jake Gyllenhaal's got the acting chops, the leading man face and the likability.