It felt like Sherlock to me, it's just that the tone had more joy to it. And it should, it's a wedding that's not written by George R.R. Martin.Vader182 wrote:Everybody keeps writing The Sign of Three didn't feel like Sherlock at all, but am I alone in plainly disagreeing? Unlike the first episode, which sours in memory the more I think on it, this episode felt classic in every way. Tonally, structurally.
-Vader
BBC's Sherlock
Posts: 7448
Joined:
February 2012
third fave ep after fall and scandal
also, on being classic
and fuck you ill double post all i want bish
This was the first case I actually solved before Sherlock. Which can either be really good or really bad.
Sherlock didn't have the benefit of a long-out of place foreboding early sequence.Bacon wrote:This was the first case I actually solved before Sherlock. Which can either be really good or really bad.
-Vader
True. I'm just sorta happy with myself. I figured out how the criminal did it and who the person did it to.Vader182 wrote:Sherlock didn't have the benefit of a long-out of place foreboding early sequence.Bacon wrote:This was the first case I actually solved before Sherlock. Which can either be really good or really bad.
-Vader
I always figured it was the but I didn't know how he did it.
Also,
Also,
Posts: 7448
Joined:
February 2012
That sequence was the highlight of the whole episode for me.SilverHeart wrote:I always figured it was thebut I didn't know how he did it.
Also,
darthnazgul wrote:That sequence was the highlight of the whole episode for me.SilverHeart wrote:I always figured it was thebut I didn't know how he did it.
Also,
My favorites from that are 'sleeeeep' 'wood' and 'sitty thing'.
