Re: Biggest Pet Peeves in Movies
Posted: June 23rd, 2017, 2:01 pm
An over-the-shoulder pov shot where dialogue is being spoken but you can clearly see the actor's mouth is not moving.
Discussion forums for the premiere fan community for and by fans of film director Christopher Nolan.
http://www.nolanfans.com/forums/
Ah I get what you mean.LelekPL wrote:That's exactly what I've been saying all this time. It is better. WTF are you on about?Nomis wrote:Your point being? Isn't this better than using a still from the production, which is for another scene, a scene that you see in the movie? Like that one of Rachel...LelekPL wrote: I didn't see Wonder Woman but that was exactly my point. They actually went out of their way to make that picture be real in BvS and from what you're saying, they recreated it in Wonder Woman.
IMAX scenes in Nolan filmsLelekPL wrote:Is there good dubbing, though?Law wrote:Bad dubbing
The thing about good dubbing is that, well, you can't distinguish from on-location voice. It's kinda like good VFX, but more difficult to see, because unlike good VFX, which can be realistic but still present something that's obviously imposible to film on-camera, good dubbing is just people saying stuff.LelekPL wrote:Is there good dubbing, though? I guess in anmation it doesn't make much difference (although I still prefer the original) but in live action it's just horrendous.Law wrote:Bad dubbing
I agree. By dubbing I meant "revoicing", changing the language of the film rather than ADR.didich wrote:The thing about good dubbing is that, well, you can't distinguish from on-location voice. It's kinda like good VFX, but more difficult to see, because unlike good VFX, which can be realistic but still present something that's obviously imposible to film on-camera, good dubbing is just people saying stuff.LelekPL wrote:Is there good dubbing, though? I guess in anmation it doesn't make much difference (although I still prefer the original) but in live action it's just horrendous.Law wrote:Bad dubbing
That was a bit better because the phone video functioned as actual found footage rather than previously shown footage, but it was a bit jarring.LelekPL wrote:The super well-edited leaked phone video from Logan is also guilty of it.