Wonder Woman 1984 (2020)

All non-Nolan related film, tv, and streaming discussions.
User avatar
Forum Pro
Law
Posts: 17034
Joined: July 2010
Location: Moonlight Motel

User avatar
Posts: 13958
Joined: May 2010
Location: Mumbai
furries rejoice!

User avatar
Posts: 19209
Joined: June 2012
Location: stuck in 2020
I doubt she would when it's done by a professional prosthetic/make-up team. I'm curious to see what they have in mind for Cheetah. Perhaps the look they're after does only work with CG or a combination of CG and practical, we just don't know yet. I hope they won't animate her eyes though.

Posts: 4794
Joined: January 2012
Films like LOTR had great prosthetics, practical and make-up effects, which is why I will always prefer practical make-up effects over a CG creation.

User avatar
Posts: 13506
Joined: February 2011
And the same LOTR also had one of the greatest CGI creations in the history of cinema, which to date is one of if not the most revered aspect of those films.£

Posts: 4794
Joined: January 2012
Master Virgo wrote:
May 22nd, 2018, 8:37 pm
And the same LOTR also had one of the greatest CGI creations in the history of cinema, which to date is one of if not the most revered aspect of those films.£
I know but they had several years of pre-production and I have not seen many motion capture characters that could rival that particular CG creation since.

User avatar
Posts: 446
Joined: May 2013
Location: Hong Kong
Batfan175 wrote:
May 22nd, 2018, 9:13 pm
Master Virgo wrote:
May 22nd, 2018, 8:37 pm
And the same LOTR also had one of the greatest CGI creations in the history of cinema, which to date is one of if not the most revered aspect of those films.£
I know but they had several years of pre-production and I have not seen many motion capture characters that could rival that particular CG creation since.
The Na'vi? Caesar? Hulk? With the right budget and good design, it's definitely doable.

User avatar
Posts: 11389
Joined: December 2011
anarchy wrote:
May 22nd, 2018, 11:56 pm
Batfan175 wrote:
May 22nd, 2018, 9:13 pm
Master Virgo wrote:
May 22nd, 2018, 8:37 pm
And the same LOTR also had one of the greatest CGI creations in the history of cinema, which to date is one of if not the most revered aspect of those films.£
I know but they had several years of pre-production and I have not seen many motion capture characters that could rival that particular CG creation since.
The Na'vi? Caesar? Hulk? With the right budget and good design, it's definitely doable.
The Hulk ain't on the same level.

Posts: 55632
Joined: May 2010
It’s about performance, not the texture.

User avatar
Posts: 19209
Joined: June 2012
Location: stuck in 2020
Of course, in the end that's all that matters. But it definitely doesn't harm it if it looks incredible. I think next to Gollem, Davy Jones is still one of the best mo-cap they've put out there. Although it does have the huge benefit of not animating (Nighy's) eyes. Would be pretty tight if they at least don't animate Wiig's eyes, ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Post Reply