First Man (2018)

All non-Nolan related film, tv, and streaming discussions.
User avatar
Posts: 10465
Joined: January 2011
Location: Waiting for a train

User avatar
Posts: 3068
Joined: December 2016
Pioneerr wrote:
January 4th, 2019, 10:03 am
Great BTS/VFX breakdown video

http://vimeo.com/309382367
Incredible. UGH! three weeks till I get my blu-ray copy, I want to see this film again like now.

Here's an interview that features Hurwitz playing part of the theme on the theremin @ 15:29. Also, I want a theremin.

User avatar
Posts: 9466
Joined: December 2011
Out on digital today. With IMAX intact.


User avatar
Posts: 19209
Joined: June 2012
Location: stuck in 2020
can't wait to see this again, it's perfection

User avatar
Posts: 19209
Joined: June 2012
Location: stuck in 2020
Question about the Lunar scenes:
Did they shoot those family flashbacks also on 16mm and then printed it on 15/70mm IMAX? I saw this film in Laser/Atmos but not in IMAX so I obviously couldn't see the aspect ratio change during the Lunar scenes but on the blu-ray you luckily do get the aspect ratio switch.

User avatar
Posts: 3068
Joined: December 2016
Nomis wrote:
January 20th, 2019, 4:49 pm
Question about the Lunar scenes:
Did they shoot those family flashbacks also on 16mm and then printed it on 15/70mm IMAX? I saw this film in Laser/Atmos but not in IMAX so I obviously couldn't see the aspect ratio change during the Lunar scenes but on the blu-ray you luckily do get the aspect ratio switch.
Well, the 16mm segments filled the whole IMAX screen (1.90:1) - I think they also filled the whole screen in the 1.43:1 Laser version (to anyone who has seen it in that format: correct me if I'm wrong).

User avatar
Posts: 19209
Joined: June 2012
Location: stuck in 2020
I know, they also filled the entire TV screen but I was wondering if they printed it on IMAX film or did something else with it.

User avatar
Posts: 3068
Joined: December 2016
It's funny how I understood what you meant but decided to write what I wrote anyway :D

I don't know the exact workflow but I'm going to guess that it was all done digitally (DI) since they didn't make any 70mm prints (I think a print exists for archival purposes). It seems pointless to me that they would digitally scan the 16mm material then print it on 70mm film only to scan it again for a DI if that makes sense.
Last edited by Tarssauce on January 21st, 2019, 9:13 am, edited 1 time in total.

everything was scanned, graded and delivered digitally (in 2k :/)

AhmadAli95 wrote:
January 20th, 2019, 6:56 pm
It's funny how I understood what you meant but decided to write what I wrote anyway :D
this is perhaps the most succinct description of the internet ever

User avatar
Posts: 19209
Joined: June 2012
Location: stuck in 2020
Guess it's because of the amount of 16mm footage that they went for 2K?

A blu-ray sourced from a 70mm print would be bliss

Post Reply