Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald (2018)
Wait. Nagini is a person?
The Rowlster had this all worked out doncha know
the fuck are you doing on 2chan weebo
edit: why is nagini not indian i know sridevi is dead but could've hired richa chaddha or bipasha basu?
I mean I wouldn't put it past the same team who hired domestic abuser Johnny Depp to say "oh, any Asian chick will do".
Skipping the trailer. I'll see this anyway lol
Hopefully this will have at least as much substance as style.
I'm in the opposite corner to both of you. I thought the first Fantastic Beasts had a lot more substance than style and that was its chief problem. The same or very similar screenplay adapted through more capable hands would've been far more compelling.ArmandFancypants wrote: ↑September 26th, 2018, 7:02 pmI dunno, the last one had the same amount of both
As is, the whole thing has this gross coverage-coverage-coverage backlot cheap TV look to it.
-Vader
Care to elaborate on that? Isn't coverage in and of itself a neutral term? And isn't more coverage something good?Vader182 wrote: ↑September 26th, 2018, 7:08 pmI'm in the opposite corner to both of you. I thought the first Fantastic Beasts had a lot more substance than style and that was its chief problem. The same or very similar screenplay adapted through more capable hands would've been far more compelling.ArmandFancypants wrote: ↑September 26th, 2018, 7:02 pmI dunno, the last one had the same amount of both
As is, the whole thing has this gross coverage-coverage-coverage backlot cheap TV look to it.
-Vader
Sorry
