sounds perfect for you cil
-Vader
Star Wars Episode IX - The Rise of Skywalker (2019)
-Vader
Posts: 4794
Joined:
January 2012
Lol, I mean I wouldn't put it past JJ Abrams or Disney to try to do this with Star Wars. The expanded universe is no longer canon to tell us that time travel is not possible in that fictional universe so...
Here's the question, what if Abrams does backtrack on plenty of stuff in Jedi (as highly unlikely as that would be), but still makes a better film in the process. Will that upset me? Not in the slightest.
I'll judge this by what it is, not by its predecessors. Past is in the past, that's the whole thing in Jedi.
I'll judge this by what it is, not by its predecessors. Past is in the past, that's the whole thing in Jedi.
Posts: 55632
Joined:
May 2010
I don’t care what he does, as long as it’s not predictable.
Predictable being Rey somehow being related to Kylo after all. Which I think JJ was (heavily) alluding to in TFA (i.e. her being the daughter of Luke) besides Maz Kanata's point who could just as well have been kept in the dark by Luke (Leia and Han included).
Given the title of the film though and TLJ, it would make more sense for her to definitely not be related to Kylo. I think the Skywalker name is going to be the new Jedi Order/resistance of some sort.
Given the title of the film though and TLJ, it would make more sense for her to definitely not be related to Kylo. I think the Skywalker name is going to be the new Jedi Order/resistance of some sort.
You know I agree with this, the idea of a lot of time travel to change things just sounds bad and unappealing on paper to me. I’m open to being surprised.Master Virgo wrote: ↑July 15th, 2019, 10:32 amHere's the question, what if Abrams does backtrack on plenty of stuff in Jedi (as highly unlikely as that would be), but still makes a better film in the process. Will that upset me? Not in the slightest.
I'll judge this by what it is, not by its predecessors. Past is in the past, that's the whole thing in Jedi.
I’m still not sure what Vader was getting at, was he dismissing this possibility or endorsing it?
Here's a list of what Abrams has changed direction (these are just in the marketing, footage, and interviews, and magazine articles, not spoiler rumors) from TLJ. I'll put it under a tag because it's a long list of knowns:
^ the vast majority of those aren’t “changes” lol
So many "fans" confuse simply paying off what was set up before as "fan service" or "predictable" storytelling. The illiteracy is real.
And no, I don't think there's a high likelihood of time travel. That one book cover does imply we might have
Based on everything I've heard, TROS will make at least a couple big swing conceptual ideas. The mere presence of Palpatine demonstrates this.
-Vader
And no, I don't think there's a high likelihood of time travel. That one book cover does imply we might have
-Vader
