Spielberg is the living embodiment of what Tarantino was calling «flaccid-dick movies» for directors after 60. The guy is hurting his legacy a little bit more with each new film for me.
Tarantino's not right for everyone of course. Scorsese and Lynch are arguably still at their peak in their 70s but Spielberg should just retire
Spielberg is the living embodiment of what Tarantino was calling «flaccid-dick movies» for directors after 60. The guy is hurting his legacy a little bit more with each new film for me.
Tarantino's not right for everyone of course. Scorsese and Lynch are arguably still at their peak in their 70s but Spielberg should just retire
But he made one of his greatest films just 7 years ago, and a superb one 3 years ago
Spielberg is the living embodiment of what Tarantino was calling «flaccid-dick movies» for directors after 60. The guy is hurting his legacy a little bit more with each new film for me.
Tarantino's not right for everyone of course. Scorsese and Lynch are arguably still at their peak in their 70s but Spielberg should just retire
But he made one of his greatest films just 7 years ago, and a superb one 3 years ago
Tintin? War Horse? One of his greatest films? Those are middling films for him.
Last edited by bootsy on March 9th, 2018, 8:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Spielberg is the living embodiment of what Tarantino was calling «flaccid-dick movies» for directors after 60. The guy is hurting his legacy a little bit more with each new film for me.
Tarantino's not right for everyone of course. Scorsese and Lynch are arguably still at their peak in their 70s but Spielberg should just retire
But he made one of his greatest films just 7 years ago, and a superb one 3 years ago
Tintin? War Horse? One of his greatest films? Those are middling films for him.