The Hateful Eight (2015)

All non-Nolan related film, tv, and streaming discussions.
User avatar
Posts: 8217
Joined: May 2014
Quentin Tarantino Says He Cut a Different Version of ‘The Hateful Eight’
When audiences pay to see the limited roadshow engagement of Quentin Tarantino’s “The Hateful Eight” this holiday season, it won’t just be the projection of Ultra Panavision 70mm photography that distinguishes it from multiplex versions released two weeks later. It will be a slightly different and longer film overall.

“The roadshow version has an overture and an intermission, and it will be three hours, two minutes,” Tarantino told Variety. “The multiplex version is about six minutes shorter, not counting the intermission time, which is about 12 minutes.”

The two-time Oscar winner was not ordered to truncate the film for wider release. Rather, he liked the idea of the roadshow experience having a little something extra. “Nor did I want to treat the multiplex release like this left-handed version, either,” he said. So he tweaked certain scenes to better suit the separate viewing experiences.

“The 70 is the 70,” he said. “You’ve paid the money. You’ve bought your ticket. So you’re there. I’ve got you. But I actually changed the cutting slightly for a couple of the multiplex scenes because it’s not that. Now it’s on Showtime Extreme. You’re watching it on TV and you just kind of want to watch a movie on your couch. Or you’re at Hot Dog on a Stick and you just want to catch a movie.”

The sequences in question play in “big, long, cool, unblinking takes” in the 70mm version, Tarantino said. “It was awesome in the bigness of 70, but sitting on your couch, maybe it’s not so awesome. So I cut it up a little bit. It’s a little less precious about itself.”

Roadshow experiences are rare these days, but they have been implemented by filmmakers looking to make splashes. Kevin Smith toured his 2011 film “Red State,” four-walling it in theaters across the country at premium prices. In 2008, Steven Soderbergh’s two-part “Che” was presented as a double-feature roadshow in certain markets. Tarantino’s fellow celluloid proponents Paul Thomas Anderson (“The Master”) and Christopher Nolan (“Interstellar”) have released movies in the 70mm format in recent years, but it’s mostly reserved for repertory and retrospective programs.

Panavision retrofitted lenses for cameras during production of “The Hateful Eight” and made 2,000-foot magazines to hold the massive amounts of film. The Weinstein Company is paying to install projectors in venues across the country. While only 16 70mm prints for “The Master” were struck, and 12 for “Interstellar,” the ambitious plan for the “Hateful Eight” roadshow is to play in 100 theaters.

Tarantino, who revamped the New Beverly Theater in Los Angeles last year with a film only directive, said 70mm could be a way to combat ubiquitous digital projection, a development he considers a bridge too far in the steady move away from celluloid.

“I didn’t realize what a lost cause 35mm projection was. But what I also didn’t know is how excited everyone was going to be about 70. I think everybody is looking to see how we do in that first two weeks. But that’s also kind of exciting. I’m hoping that it does well enough that that becomes, for the filmmakers who care, the new premier way to launch their movie in an exclusive way.”

User avatar
Posts: 5279
Joined: May 2014
Just tell me where to go, and I'll be there.

User avatar
Posts: 916
Joined: February 2012

User avatar
Posts: 8217
Joined: May 2014

User avatar
Posts: 5279
Joined: May 2014
I don't know what to think about that trailer.

User avatar
Posts: 4288
Joined: May 2014
Location: “Where are you?!” “HERE.”
Panapaok wrote:
I liked this more than the first trailer, but I'm still not excited...at all. Which for a Tarantino movie, for ME...doesn't make sense.

User avatar
Posts: 19209
Joined: June 2012
Location: stuck in 2020
Well I chose to ignore anything about this until I sit my ass in the theater. However, the trailer played in front of Crimson Peak and I was like: "well, I've literally seen NOTHING from this and for a three hour film it might not give that much away." so I watched most of the thing.... I also felt little to no excitement after it.. It looks good but not amazing. Real bummer Madsen is in this tbh and I'm a bit done with Jackson's performances in Tarantino's films. Would've liked to see other actors than them in this.
Nevertheless, I will see this in theater anyway and I hope to find a theater that'll show the 70mm print (which could be possible). And it better be good.

User avatar
Posts: 5219
Joined: January 2012
Ugh that wasn't very good but this is not a very easy film to make trailers of based on the old script.

Like most Tarantino movies anyway, the trailers for Inglourious Basterds were terrible and didn't reflect the tone of the movie at all

I'm still crazy excited for it

User avatar
Posts: 8217
Joined: May 2014
Yeah, the trailer isn't great but the footage looks glorious. I'm sure the movie will be great as well.

User avatar
Posts: 43129
Joined: May 2010
Panapaok wrote:
Great trailer. Definitely better than the first one.

Post Reply