Page 5 of 219
Re: Bond 25 (2016)
Posted: November 4th, 2015, 2:25 pm
by ArmandFancypants
I think the Joe Wright goose has been cooked by Pan.
The Edgar Wright goose however...
I would have no problem per se with Mendes coming back but get the fucking script right, c'mon.
Re: Bond 25 (2016)
Posted: November 4th, 2015, 2:27 pm
by prince0gotham
guy ritchie haaaaaa
Re: Bond 25 (2016)
Posted: November 4th, 2015, 2:32 pm
by m4st4
Just let it marinate, make people thirsty for 007, then give it to Nolan bros during his 2017 premiere thingie... premiere date: late 2019.
Re: Bond 25 (2016)
Posted: November 4th, 2015, 2:34 pm
by Michaelf2225
Allstar wrote:Now Where Was I ? wrote:So...any guesses for the next director?
Hopefully Refn.
I love Refn... But for Bond?
pls no
Re: Bond 25 (2016)
Posted: November 4th, 2015, 2:38 pm
by ArmandFancypants
m4st4 wrote:Just let it marinate, make people thirsty for 007, then give it to Nolan bros during his 2017 premiere thingie... premiere date: late 2019.
fuck no, Bond film every 2 years please.
Re: Bond 25 (2016)
Posted: November 4th, 2015, 2:41 pm
by Michaelf2225
idk, the four year break between QoS and SF worked pretty well
Re: Bond 25 (2016)
Posted: November 4th, 2015, 2:44 pm
by m4st4
ArmandFancypants wrote:m4st4 wrote:Just let it marinate, make people thirsty for 007, then give it to Nolan bros during his 2017 premiere thingie... premiere date: late 2019.
fuck no, Bond film every 2 years please.
Why? If they're gonna be merely solid entries why not just give it extra bit of time and actually pull off something grand again?
Re: Bond 25 (2016)
Posted: November 4th, 2015, 2:46 pm
by shauner111
ArmandFancypants wrote:m4st4 wrote:Just let it marinate, make people thirsty for 007, then give it to Nolan bros during his 2017 premiere thingie... premiere date: late 2019.
fuck no, Bond film every 2 years please.
Quality over quantity.
Re: Bond 25 (2016)
Posted: November 4th, 2015, 3:06 pm
by ArmandFancypants
There's absolutely nothing preventing them from being able to produce a good Bond film in 2 years. Not a damn thing.
Step 1 is to stop going back to the Purvis & Wade well, though.
Re: Bond 25 (2016)
Posted: November 4th, 2015, 4:12 pm
by m4st4
ArmandFancypants wrote:There's absolutely nothing preventing them from being able to produce a good Bond film in 2 years. Not a damn thing.
Step 1 is to stop going back to the Purvis & Wade well, though.
Well, yeah. It goes both ways. But 'Bond every 2 years!' sounds a lot like something that you, as a fan, would like... I'd rather see one after a while after couple of quickies then grow tired of the familiar tune.