Christopher Nolan Fans
Christopher Nolan Fans

Does the Rachel recast bother anyone?

The 2008 mega success about Batman's attempts to defeat a criminal mastermind known only as the Joker.

Does the Rachel recast bother anyone?

Post tykjen January 10, 2012, 12:21 pm

Highland_3 wrote:
oliverjj wrote:
Same. Pretty much Nolan's worst decision as a director/writer was that character and both actresses he had to play her.


lolwut?

Rachel Dawes is very important in BB. Less so in TDK, but she still has a role to play in the film. Stating that the character is Nolan's "worst decision as a director/writer" is ludicrous.


The CASTING was ludicrous.
There's a good chance you wont like me. But an even better chance I wont care
Image
User avatar
tykjen Male
A Watchful Protector
A Watchful Protector
 
Posts: 4539
Joined: May 2011
Location: Insomnia, Norway

Does the Rachel recast bother anyone?

Post oliverjj January 10, 2012, 12:39 pm

Highland_3 wrote:
oliverjj wrote:
Same. Pretty much Nolan's worst decision as a director/writer was that character and both actresses he had to play her.


lolwut?

Rachel Dawes is very important in BB. Less so in TDK, but she still has a role to play in the film. Stating that the character is Nolan's "worst decision as a director/writer" is ludicrous.



Agree to disagree, but I stand by my reasoning. I for one feel this character with the way she was written and the way she was portrayed poorly--TWICE--was always the weakest link from any of Nolan's films. The first time she was portrayed by someone very attractive but too babyfaced and with zero convincing acting skill. The second time, by someone not attractive at all and who also sounded like she was reading from the page. Between two movies the character has failed to make me care at all for her.

Much as I enjoy Nolan's decisions with his movies, he's not flawless to me and the writing and acting of Rachel Dawes stands out to me and many others fans as example(s) of his poorer decisions.
oliverjj None specified
Civilian
 
Posts: 13
Joined: November 2011

Does the Rachel recast bother anyone?

Post Master Virgo January 10, 2012, 4:12 pm

I like Maggie more than Katie but Katie's portrayal of Rachel was far better than Maggy's. The only problem with Katie's performance was that she couldn't keep her seriousness as a lawyer and be likable at the same time which is something that I think for example an actress like Reese Witherspoon could've done a lot better. The thing with Gyllenhaal was that she couldn't seem like a serious lawyer in the first place.
Image
User avatar
Master Virgo None specified
A Legend
A Legend
 
Posts: 5079
Joined: February 2011

Does the Rachel recast bother anyone?

Post Highland_3 January 10, 2012, 6:41 pm

Oh there's no argument about the casting from my side, but the character is important - not just as a "love interest" - but for both BB and TDK to work.

She is essentially Harvey Dent in BB. She represents that ray of light in a corrupt justice service. Just like Gordon is that ray of light in a corrupt police department, and Batman is that ray of light in the corrupt society.

In TDK, that's why her and Harvey are together. The old meets the new with regards to the justice system in Gotham.

That triangle needs to exist, and we see when Dent is removed, that triangle no longer exists and hell breaks loose. It's useful imagery on Nolan's part, or at least that is how I interpret it.
User avatar
Highland_3 Male
Blackgate Inmate
Blackgate Inmate
 
Posts: 292
Joined: December 2011
Location: Scotland, UK

Does the Rachel recast bother anyone?

Post new-york January 11, 2012, 1:35 pm

yes, just for the sake of continuity.

that's a little flaw for a trilogy.

but nothing too serious.
It's all relative.
User avatar
new-york Male
Henchman
Henchman
 
Posts: 25
Joined: December 2011

Does the Rachel recast bother anyone?

Post Muezzin January 12, 2012, 3:26 pm

Highland_3 wrote:Oh there's no argument about the casting from my side, but the character is important - not just as a "love interest" - but for both BB and TDK to work.

She is essentially Harvey Dent in BB. She represents that ray of light in a corrupt justice service. Just like Gordon is that ray of light in a corrupt police department, and Batman is that ray of light in the corrupt society.

I agree. And it would have been amazingly ballsy to follow that train of thought and turn Rachel into a female Two-Face (i.e. Harvey Dent would not even be in TDK).

TDK was of course an amazingly ballsy masterpiece anyway. I'm just curious about the road not taken.
User avatar
Muezzin Male
Henchman
Henchman
 
Posts: 45
Joined: December 2011
Location: United Kingdom

Does the Rachel recast bother anyone?

Post jesse May 16, 2012, 2:46 am

I personally think that Maggie did a great job in her scene with The Joker. She looked truly terrified and it felt very real to me. Just saying.
jesse None specified
The Cone
 
Posts: 6
Joined: September 2011

Does the Rachel recast bother anyone?

Post Falcone May 16, 2012, 3:03 am

"... And you are beautiful."

No, no she isn't. God, simply saying a character is beautiful doesn't make it true. Maggie Gyl is a good enough actress, but I seriously would have taken a less talented actress in favor of someone comparable to Bale or Eckhart's attraction and stature.
User avatar
Falcone Male
Blackgate Inmate
Blackgate Inmate
 
Posts: 456
Joined: May 2012
Location: Nebraska

Does the Rachel recast bother anyone?

Post Vader182 May 16, 2012, 3:10 am

In your opinion. Worth noting because looks are incredibly subjective, and she has been super attractive in past roles.

In my opinion, she looked like shit in this. And she gave a mostly "okay" to bad performance. Never took much away from the movie though, minus a few scenes. She did well in the climactic chained up scene though.

-Vader
"Unlike painting and literature, the cinema both gives to life and takes from it. Literature and painting both exist as art from the very start; the cinema doesn’t."
-Jean-Luc Godard
User avatar
Vader182 Male
A Legend
A Legend
 
Posts: 9164
Joined: June 2010
Location: The White City

Does the Rachel recast bother anyone?

Post Threshold May 16, 2012, 4:09 am

Image
Image
User avatar
Threshold Male
Wayne Board Member
Wayne Board Member
 
Posts: 839
Joined: January 2012
Location: Australia

PreviousNext


Return to The Dark Knight

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest