It actually turned out awesome, since it looks like the camera trying to keep up with the Joker. This may be more chilling than actually showing it! ...Maybe
CGI Two-Face...Why?
Maybe?solo2001 wrote:It actually turned out awesome, since it looks like the camera trying to keep up with the Joker. This may be more chilling than actually showing it! ...Maybe
It is.
else there wouldn't be difference in cheap slashers in gore-fest films and The Joker.
gib sigs
Posts: 2512
Joined:
November 2009
The CGI was great,that BF Two-Face is bullshit compared with the TDK one.
was there need to be worse?chee wrote: They could've been a lot worse in a rated R movie.
Posts: 11
Joined:
July 2012
Uncanny valley. The point was to make the CGI look as dramatized as possible. If the wounds looked realisitic, people would be offended the whole film.
Cause this is the only appropriate way to use CGI.
Posts: 91
Joined:
July 2012
It's because you can't make it look like the face was burned off with makeup. You can't take away facial depth by adding layers over it.
And by the time you're done reading this, you'll realize that this is just my sig
'cause obviously there are problems with burning off half of Aaron Eckhart's face in real life? 
Posts: 88
Joined:
July 2012
I personally thought it did stand out a bit. I don't really like the CGI (or even if it was make up, it looked fake).
