Discussion forums for the premiere fan community for and by fans of film director Christopher Nolan.
http://www.nolanfans.com/forums/
They're more or less meant to be cool gadgetry, referencing James Bond. We aren't supposed to think of them as realistic.Code_R wrote:90%. The bat sonar vision thing and the fingerprints off a bullet are still REALLY silly, but overall it's a classic. The IMAX theatre version was eye popping, and the music (and uses of no music at all) are masterful in places.
It was meant to be just a bit of fun, really, I think you're overreacting to it far too much.Code_R wrote:Yes, but still silly when everything else has some basis in reality, and they've gone to lengths to make it grounded - even the flying cape thing seems feasible in a thin way. It takes me out of the movie when it shows the view point of SONAR in such high detail, or the prints from a destroyed bullet being usable in anyway at all!
I would. Bale's voice.redfan wrote:100% for me. It's one of my all-time favourites, in the year after it came out I watched it once every month (which is quite a lot for me). It's a perfect movie for me, even if it has weaknesses they don't matter to me. I wouldn't change one tiny thing of it.
Baconboy wrote:I would. Bale's voice.redfan wrote:100% for me. It's one of my all-time favourites, in the year after it came out I watched it once every month (which is quite a lot for me). It's a perfect movie for me, even if it has weaknesses they don't matter to me. I wouldn't change one tiny thing of it.
TDK has it's flaws but it's definitely not his voice.Because there is nothing to care about.Only the nitpickers can considered this as a flaw.redfan wrote:I honestly don't care about his voice. I only would, if he didn't changed it as Batman.
The only time where it's goes bad is here:Baconboy wrote:I just don't like it. I'm not a nip-picker, but the voice does get on my nerves. It doesn't stop me from enjoying the movie, tho.
