Loading...
Christopher's 2005 reboot of the Batman franchise that tells the origins of how Bruce Wayne became Batman.

so Guy Pearce was originally considered for Ra's Al Ghul?

Posts: 15900
and he was going to be younger as the character?

never knew this. that would have been pretty cool but i loved Neeson in the part
Posts: 13925
Location: La La Land
Eh, Neeson seems like the better casting choice for the role.
Posts: 7305
Location: London town, UK
Guy Pearce is Great... but Neeson... was top notch and a great choice.
Posts: 18333
Z. Cobb wrote:Guy Pearce is Great... but Neeson... was top notch and a great choice.


+1
Posts: 10411
Mortensen was a better choice.
Posts: 6694
Location: The Discount Inn
I like Guy a lot and I wish Nolan used him some more and hopefully will in the future but this would be kind of funny to me. Guy isn't that young, older than Chris but he looks really young for his age. It would work but Liam was perfect casting.
Posts: 2278
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Mason01 wrote:
Z. Cobb wrote:Guy Pearce is Great... but Neeson... was top notch and a great choice.


+1

+2
Posts: 163
Location: Italy
He was first considered for Bruce Wayne/Batman role..
then, for Harvey Dent in the sequel.

In both cases, Nolan then chose another actor.

First choice for Ducard/Ra's Al Ghul was Viggo Mortensen, but he refused.
Posts: 6694
Location: The Discount Inn
Slask wrote:He was first considered for Bruce Wayne/Batman role..
then, for Harvey Dent in the sequel.

In both cases, Nolan then chose another actor.

First choice for Ducard/Ra's Al Ghul was Viggo Mortensen, but he refused.

:o What? No :lol:
I cannot see him as Ra's
Maybe because Liam was the best choice IMO
Posts: 3861
Really? I could totally see Viggo as Ra's, in fact he might have been better than Liam (not that he was bad), but we'll never know.
Next page →
← Return to Batman Begins
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest.