Search found 1213 matches

by Dobson
Forum: Dunkirk
Topic: Dunkirk General Information/Discussion
Replies: 8063
Views: 1152532

Re: Dunkirk General Information

Couldn't that location be for some kind of dream sequence, stuff that might happen or some other pretentious bullshit?
by Dobson
Forum: Movies & TV
Topic: Let's talk about...[Insert film/person]
Replies: 1082
Views: 87416

Re: Let's talk about: Page 34 - NOLAN FILMOGRAPHY DISCUSSION

Yeah, this is the first Nolan movie I ever saw and I watched it as a kid and was confused by the flashbacks (I also thought it was a prequel to '89 lmao). Wasn't it intended as a prequel (sort of) to 1989's Batman? I think they said so in the documentary about the TDK trilogy, called "the fire rise...
by Dobson
Forum: Movies & TV
Topic: SPECTRE (2015)
Replies: 3841
Views: 242580

Re: SPECTRE (2015)

ComptonTerry wrote: Another problem is the reveal of Waltz as Blofeld. Not only was it obvious as hell, but revealing himself as Blofeld to out characters is stupid because the name doesn't mean anything to them, only to the audience.
This!

by Dobson
Forum: Movies & TV
Topic: Ben-Hur (2016)
Replies: 116
Views: 9494

Re: Ben-Hur (2016)

I despise everything this movie is and stands for.
by Dobson
Forum: Dunkirk
Topic: Dunkirk General Information/Discussion
Replies: 8063
Views: 1152532

Re: Dunkirk General Information

It looks completely different though
by Dobson
Forum: Movies & TV
Topic: Silence (2016)
Replies: 748
Views: 63409

Re: Silence (2016)

mchekhov 2: Chek Harder wrote:some1 stick a trailer in me rite nao
by Dobson
Forum: Movies & TV
Topic: Suicide Squad (2016)
Replies: 3143
Views: 236228

Re: Suicide Squad (2016)

Suicide Squad dropped 67.3% for an estimated $43.7 million, almost spot on what we were expecting after its opening weekend seven days ago. The film's domestic cume is now up to $222.8 million while it added another $58.7 million in its second weekend internationally, bringing its global cume to $4...
by Dobson
Forum: Movies & TV
Topic: A Hologram for the King (2016)
Replies: 20
Views: 2291

Re: A Hologram for the King (2016)

Yeah, it bombed. Grossed $7,7 million with a budget of $30 million, Wikipedia says. With bloody Tom Hanks in the leading role! But there really was no marketing at all. I didn't even knew it was out yet.