what a cocktease.

9/10 I agree that it gets a little bit sluggish in the middle, but it didn't detract much from all the things it did so well. LOVE the cinematography. Some of the best I've seen recently. Mood, tone, characters. All very good. And I think the "message" of the movie isn't as straightforward as some h...

Eisenberg is easily the biggest draw for me here. His bit in the new trailer all but confirmed my hopes.

Had a girl over last night, browsed netflix and we settled on Adventureland. The lady friend quite enjoyed it. Somehow Kristen Stewart is likable in that.

Mantis Toboggan wrote:Am I the only one who hopes that they shoot this in film and digital at the same time.

lolol that's getting a bit too.....meta? I don't know.

I'm sure they'll talk about and show that. It's something Wiseau is very proud of.

I know you weren't asking for MY thoughts on the Kubrick, but I'll give 'em to you anyway. I generally do a pretty good job of separating the art from the artist. Obviously I like it more when the artist, as a person, is someone I can like or agree with, but it's fine if they aren't. I don't boycott...

I like that you said "debunked." A lot of the issues he cites aren't real problems. That being said several of them are, and I like your sentiment that it's just a part of film.

And yeah, I hate that "everything wrong with" shit.

like continuity stuff? There was a video that went around a few years ago showing MANY problems with the fantastic armored car chase scene. It shows a LOT of problems, but the thing is, you're not thinking about those when you watch it. The characters, the images, the lighting, the sound, the pacing...

The Dark Knight is pretty close to perfect.

It's us. We brought ourselves here.

Could it be perfect and still have something that is better than it? Does perfect mean best?

if perfect=infinite
and Lawrence of Arabia>the prestige
and the prestige=perfect
then Lawrence of Arabia is like=infinity+5
and infinity+5=infinity

what the fuck am I talking about?