Very Nice he pulls off a tux well.

This may seem like the most absurd and ridiculous comment/question that has ever appeared on this forum. But as a film student, I am quite inspired by several people, nolan in particular. TDKR happens to begin principle photography soon after I get out for the summer. Right now, I already have some ...

TDK was so good, and then Inception blew my mind far more. I keep asking myself how the TDKR can be even better than TDK or even Inception. At this point, I'm unsure what to expect. Do you think it will be equal or Better than his last two films?

again, NOLAN is OVERSEEING it which means he's going to have say on the production end of it. it's no different from george lucas and spielberg. spielberg maybe the director but it's still lucas' vision on those indiana jones movies. nolan and snyder have two different styles. i do not see an issue...

I guess the thing thats getting me the most is that it seems like you are against film and pro digital. which is fine, i could care less. But if you really still like the look of film (which idk if you do), then why are you defending digital so much and saying that its going to replace film? even if...

Spielberg is. Not that i aspire to be him or respect much of his recent work. I do admire that aspect of him. he said once that "I will use all the film in the world until it is all gone"

Of course i'm a fan by the way. Every film maker should be a fan. And I'm not switching. Im just saying i prefer film, and i don't want nolan switching to digital. Just for something to be more superior, doesn't mean it is better.

Nothing you say is affecting me and will ever change my opinion of film vs digital. Film is an art to me. Shooting with it, cutting the negative, watching it on print. there is nothing like it. It wasn't ever intended to have a perfect picture, and thats why its beautiful. Just think about what you'...

"What is the point of that last post? Why would he stay shooting on film if the digital picture is superior and easier to shoot on? The latter of which is already true. It has nothing to do with intelligence, it's matter of making your film look the best while not suffering too much in the efficienc...

I would hope in a million years, with his intelligence, that he would never switch to digital. It doesn't matter how clear digital does get, film will always be film, and digital will always be digital.