Christopher Nolan Fans
Christopher Nolan Fans
The Dark Knight Rises

15 Things That Didn’t Bother Us About The Dark Knight Rises

Posted on Thursday, July 26, 2012 at 10:27 pm by Brendan Hodges

bane like 15 Things That Didnt Bother Us About The Dark Knight Rises

Foreword: We believe ourselves to be friends and colleagues of the good folks over at /Film, the popular film news site that posted an article listing off 15 things that bothered them about The Dark Knight Rises. As Co-founder and Sr. Editor editor here at NolanFans, I thought it should be noted that this rebuttal article was not written out of malice, haste, or fanboy-ism. Instead, we believe we have valid and objective counter arguments to the ones made by /Film. We love that people are debating this film, and we hope to encourage further debate and fun amongst fans and detractors alike.  — Teddy Blass

Warning: The following features MASSIVE SPOILERS, so read no more if you (for some reason) have yet to see the film. If you need to, refresh yourselves with /Film‘s original 15 complaints about the film before reading our rebuttal. So, without further ado, let’s jump into it. Again, MASSIVE SPOILERS follow.

15things 01 15 Things That Didnt Bother Us About The Dark Knight Rises

When and how did Bane find out about Batman’s identity and Applied Sciences?

Despite /Film’s effective answer to its own criticism, it’s worth noting the implication of Talia and Ra’s al Ghul’s tight relationship. Some viewers seem mistaken in the belief that Talia houses negative sentiments towards her father for excommunicating Bane. However, she possesses a thick hatred towards Bruce. Hatred enough to devise an elaborate plan to destroy Bruce Wayne on every level — a hatred ignited by the murder of her father. Additionally, as leader of one of the world’s most dangerous secret societies, who is about to launch a mission to destroy the world’s largest city by targeting and defeating what you felt was your greatest student, it may be worthwhile to impart this knowledge to the rest of the League, not to mention your successor and daughter. Furthermore (and without assuming this communication) Ra’s clearly states in Batman Begins that he is able to identify Bruce as Batman based on the use of League tactics. So, as both Talia and Bane were trained by the League, they should equally be able to distinguish Batman’s tactics and attach them to the one (presumably) rogue member: Bruce Wayne.

Now that Bruce Wayne has been established as Batman, it doesn’t take a genius or specially training to deduce that his weapons and vehicles are likely produced/housed in his company. Given Talia’s chair on the Wayne Enterprises board, she likely has a decent understanding of the building’s layout and, given her League affiliations, she knows what to look for in determining the likely location of Batman’s secret arsenal. Also, other people have been in this wing of Wayne Enterprises in The Dark Knight, so it’s secrecy isn’t absolute. Remember in Batman Begins when Ra’s accuses Bruce of “defending a city so corrupt” that they have “infiltrated every level” of its infrastructure? It’s plausible that someone from the League could have helped construct or locate it from within Wayne Enterprises. However, even if this isn’t the case, it’s easy to assume the arsenal is the bottom level of the building so it’s A.) Easiest to hide and B.) Easy to transport vehicles into and out of the building. Provided this, Bane would just have to dig up to find Applied Sciences.

 

15things 02 15 Things That Didnt Bother Us About The Dark Knight Rises

Blake Intuits That Bruce Wayne is Batman

The film goes to great lengths to portray John Blake as a skilled and intuitive detective — beginning with his monologue to Bruce Wayne saying the orphans made up pretend stories about him. This insinuates the stories involved the “poster boy orphan” being their hero Batman. Their love of Batman is reinforced by the young orphan boy seemingly habitually sketching bat symbols as he and Blake hope for Batman’s return. It’s further reinforced by Blake labeling these stories as “legends” about Bruce, but because of Blake’s detective skills and similar emotional path, he made a more literal connection. Throughout the remainder of the film, Blake shows similar intuitive skills; From his investigation of the sewer system (which — among other things — impressed Gordon enough to instantly promote him to detective), to investigating the intricate layout of explosive laced concrete poured all over the city (Gordon mentions Blake knows patterns), to instantly deducing the mercenaries’ attempt to murder Gordon. However, the /Film guys miss the deeper meaning of the initial scene, acting as if all was designed merely as an early-film twist with surface level (arbitrary) plot problems. John Blake and Bruce Wayne are essentially the same person with mirrored experiences, principles (Blake’s disgust at his realization he killed two men), and this parallel pushes Bruce to return to the cape and cowl.

 

15things 03 15 Things That Didnt Bother Us About The Dark Knight Rises

Bruce Wayne Is Down, Then Back Up, Then Down, Then Back Up…

The purpose of the limp shows the distance Bruce has fallen from the empowered physical prowess of being Batman. And as it is never focused on as a major plot or narrative point, a quick resolution with one of Bruce’s many expensive gadgets is a minor point in the more significant focus of the first act of the film: Bruce’s mental and emotional state — something that is manifested physically in his limp. If anything, it shows Bruce’s initial reluctance to heal, mentally or physically.

Additionally, the /Film writers criticize Bruce starting out low, then rising, and repeat, but this analysis ignores a major focal point of the film. Alfred worriedly remarks to Bruce that putting on the cape and cowl doesn’t automatically enable him to be Batman again. He’s afraid Bruce lacks the belief (in contrast to Bane’s abundance of belief — something else pointed out by Alfred) and conviction to become the Batman we know, love, and aspire to be. And he didn’t. So as he is thrown into the pit defeated and broken mentally, physically, and emotionally, the successful climb out of the pit is the first time Batman truly emerges in the film.

It’s a major convention in film for characters to heal significantly faster than they might otherwise in reality. It seems silly to have this suddenly be a big criticism after a century of film.

 

15things 04 15 Things That Didnt Bother Us About The Dark Knight Rises

Alfred Says Goodbye to Bruce

While I cannot argue against a visceral reaction, I found the goodbye poignant and emotional, and so have the majority of people I’ve spoken to about the film. Many strongly feel Caine deserves a nomination (or win) for his performance in the film, and scenes like this one show why.

As for the stage of the conversation, the hallway serves as a link between the Batcave and Wayne manor  — a thematic crossroads signifying the struggle between choosing the normal life Alfred wishes and the Batman persona Bruce compulsively feels he needs.

 

15things 05 15 Things That Didnt Bother Us About The Dark Knight Rises

Why Wouldn’t the SEC Just Overturn Bane’s Fraudulent Trades

Lucius Fox tells Bruce that it will take months for lawyers to overturn the fraudulent trades, likely because Bruce’s own fingerprints were used for the transaction and proving the trades were made without his knowledge is likely a tricky path. Bruce is left penniless and is forced to approach Miranda Tate for help.

 

15things 06 15 Things That Didnt Bother Us About The Dark Knight Rises

Christian Bale and Marion Cotillard Have Sex

While the underdevelopment of their relationship is amongst the most obvious and notable flaws of the film, they did at least know each other prior (it’s even implied there’s an off-screen romantic involvement when Bruce says he hopes she liked him for more than his money), but that hardly means much — especially in contrast to the sizzling chemistry between Hathaway and Bale. Still, suggesting the twist is a superficial one for the sake of a twist ignores the obvious intentions behind it. While the relationship doesn’t mean much to the viewer, it certainly does to Bruce. The power of her betrayal isn’t just that they had sex, it’s what she represents. As Bane points out repeatedly, there cannot be great suffering without hope. Tate was Bruce’s hope — hope for Wayne Enterprises, hope to stop the bomb, hope for a future beyond Batman. In revealing the weight and patience of her vengeance, Batman’s persona crumbles and Bruce speaks in his natural voice, in pain and deeply hurt. Just as he fought for Selina Kyle’s redemption, she returns to save him, demonstrating the far-reaching impact of Batman’s powerful influence on the citizens of Gotham.

 

15things 07 15 Things That Didnt Bother Us About The Dark Knight Rises

So Batman is a street artist now?

Bruce Wayne escaped the prison pit about three weeks prior to his return to Gotham (Gordon says it’s 23 days until the bomb goes off right around when the men get hung from the bridge, which is immediately before Bruce climbs out). In that time, as would be true to the nature of the character, Bruce’s elaborate planning probably mapped out the steps necessary to rectify and save his city. Yes, he took the time to set a bridge aflame with his characteristic signal — a signal that let 12 million people know The Batman has returned and is here to save them. A symbol that inspired hope and courage in the hearts of Gotham’s citizens. The act inspired Foley — a representative middle class character — to reclaim his position in the resistance. Additionally, purposefully getting caught is hardly a risk given Selina’s “pull” with Bane and his men, and the fact that he’s, you know, Batman and stuff.

 

15things 08 15 Things That Didnt Bother Us About The Dark Knight Rises

Bruce Wayne Forgets to Do Proper Background Checks

/Film answered their own question. She’s Gotham’s most notorious and apparently gifted burglar (of all the possible people for Bane to hire for one of the most important elements of his plan, they elect to hire her), adopting a fake identity is probably a cinch for someone of her caliber. Still, having a thick record is obviously a risky burden to have on the off-chance of ever being caught. Why wouldn’t she want to have it erased, especially if she truly just wanted to ‘restart’ her life?

 

15things 09 15 Things That Didnt Bother Us About The Dark Knight Rises

Why Does Bane Take a Break from His Master Plan to Ship Bruce Wayne Off to the Desert?

Bane’s plan is multifaceted and deeply ingrained in psychological erosion. An implied, but crucial, element of this plan is to hold Gotham as a cautionary tale for the rest of the world — to illustrate what the world’s greatest city looks like when it’s in the hands of its citizens, when the corrupt and evil have been stripped of power. This point is reinforced when Bane hands the detonator to a regular citizen. Thus, when the city is destroyed, it appears as though a citizen chose to annihilate Gotham.

Beyond this, Bane wants to break Bruce — physically (check) but also mentally and psychologically. Bruce devoted his life to saving Gotham from destruction, and by destroying everything that Batman fought for, Bane knows that he can kill Bruce’s spirit.

 

15things 14 15 Things That Didnt Bother Us About The Dark Knight Rises

How Does Bruce Wayne Get Back to Gotham?

It’s important to note that the /Film time-frame criticisms seem inconsistent. Sometimes Bruce is gone for weeks, sometimes it’s months, but now it’s only days from escaping the pit to returning to Gotham? Bruce had around three weeks to return after leaving, and because Wayne Manor isn’t in the actual city of Gotham, he probably returned there, aka to the batcave. Thus, he’d have had access to the Batsuit, and seemingly endless gadgets to relatively easily sneak into the city. Given the resourcefulness he’s proven to have had over three films, finding a way back into the States is probably relatively straightforward. Hell, he could’ve called Alfred to hook him up.

Considering he has an intimate knowledge of the bomb and it’s workings and he followed what happened to Gotham on the television Bane setup, if Bruce has any ability to read a calendar he’d have a pretty good idea how much time is left on the bomb. He’s Batman and a master detective. Why is using that skill unnatural for the character?

 

15things 10 15 Things That Didnt Bother Us About The Dark Knight Rises

Why Does a Prison Exist Where People Can Possibly Climb To Freedom, And By Doing So, Free All The Other Prisoners?

The prison pit is an ancient prison in which only one inmate ever escaped. Actually, I’d say that’s a pretty phenomenal design. Bane runs it, told to us from a few lines of dialogue from the people commissioned to watch over Bruce. What does /Film mean when they ask if the prison accepts anyone that’s thrown in? It’s implied people are specifically placed there as it’s “hell on earth.” It’s surprising how many of these critiques/questions are answered with direct lines of dialogue.

 

15things 11 15 Things That Didnt Bother Us About The Dark Knight Rises

The Post-Bane Gotham Feels Totally Fake

In a recent interview, Nolan talked about utilizing some of the visual tools David Lean masterfully executed in his classic Doctor Zhivago. In the film, Lean shows a city busting with life, only later to show a city with empty streets and crowded interiors — a stark visual contrast demonstrating the nature of a terrifying occupation. Why wouldn’t the streets be pristine? Nobody walks on them. Historically, this is consistent with a real-life occupation, making this criticism a particularly insubstantial problem with the film.

 

15things 12 15 Things That Didnt Bother Us About The Dark Knight Rises

Are the Gotham City Police Department and CIA Really THAT Dumb?

GCPD has been established as consistently lackluster in the first two films, as well as specifically under the leadership of Foley. Mindful of the eight year gap, the police force is unprepared and unaccustomed to handling real threats. Foley consistently underestimates the significance of Bane’s attacks (note the dismissal of the Stock Exchange assault and the discussion to retract his men from chasing Bane to instead follow Batman). Confronted for the first time with by a notoriously menacing and dangerous man, Foley reacts impulsively. To corner Bane within the sprawling network of sewer lines, a large number of officers must approach from every possible entrance. Bane’s intelligent, and more than this, he can predict different people’s psychological reactions, and he used this to his benefit. Under Foley, a leader for peacetime, the police really were that inept. As evinced in The Dark Knight, Gordon would never sacrifice his entire force with such haste.

As for the CIA, the plane they used was neither large nor particularly sophisticated or militarized. It’s not entirely off base that they didn’t notice the second plane until it came closer in its approach (note the turbulence and the pilots’ rattled expressions). Yes, the agent broke protocol by ushering the hooded figures onto the plane without identification, but he wasn’t one to play by the rules anyway, i.e., his quickness to torture and threaten death to get information. The logic here isn’t perfect though, I admit.

 

15things 13 15 Things That Didnt Bother Us About The Dark Knight Rises

Most of the Hand-To-Hand Combat Is Terrible

While this is ultimately a matter of opinion, the hand to hand fighting has been a constant point of criticism in Christopher Nolan’s trilogy (notably the Hong Kong fight scenes), but here the technical fighting and fluidity of motion Batman uses against criminals is of a much higher caliber than the previous installments. The criminals are frequently stunned and terrified of Batman, so having enough time to react and aim remotely accurately enough to fire is unlikely. More importantly though, because he commonly jumps into the center of groups, firing upon him risks hitting someone immediately opposite of them, giving Batman a significant advantage over his opponents in multiple regards.

 

15things 15 15 Things That Didnt Bother Us About The Dark Knight Rises

Multiple Ending Syndrome

It should be immediately noticed that the /Film staff seems to be in the minority regarding the ending, which is nearly unanimously praised regardless of the general score awarded by critics. With that in mind, Nolan does, indeed, throw a lot at the viewer in the span of five minutes through carefully crafted montage sequences designed to be highly emotional and resounding moments.

Yet again, the /Film article makes a number of points while ignoring facts presented in dialogue. Alfred never wanted Bruce to return to Gotham (he gives a detailed monologue to such effect), so seeing Bruce in the Florence cafe should only please Alfred. Additionally, John Blake is an experienced and skilled detective with a massive arsenal before him in the fight against crime. It difficult to believe he wont be an effective deterrent with his skills and Bruce’s equipment (not to mention the likely aid of Fox). We don’t know who noticed the simultaneous disappearance of Bruce and Batman — but given Bruce’s prior history of seclusion, it’s likely most ordinary people (uninvolved in the affairs of the estate) would resolve his immediate absence as an absolute death.

Finally, the article inappropriately labels the ending with this popular criticism. Multiple ending syndrome refers to a film in which multiple moments, each a suitable emotional and narrative ending, are presented in quick succession. The Dark Knight Rises, however, does not suffer this affliction. Had the film ended with the bomb detonation, the viewer would be left without comprehending the lasting legacy and legend left by Batman, thus leaving the primary purpose of the entire trilogy unfulfilled. Events prompt one another, such as the will assessment leading to the delineation of its effects on the people and places Bruce cared about —  from Wayne Manor as a orphan house, to Blake in the batcave. The film ends with a gentle but subtle depiction of Bruce Wayne and Batman, resting and happy, and his legacy cemented in the hallowed halls of his city, revered in the spirits of Gotham’s citizens.

rises teaser poster 15 Things That Didnt Bother Us About The Dark Knight Rises

Thank you for reading. We hope you enjoyed reading our defense against the common criticisms of The Dark Knight Rises. At the very least, we hope they offered a new perspective, and we hope the folks over at /Film took our criticisms of their criticisms with stride.

Written by: Brendan Hodges
Edited by: Kelly Liesse & Teddy Blass



pixel 15 Things That Didnt Bother Us About The Dark Knight Rises

«            »
  • http://www.facebook.com/showdownatnoon Liam Christopher McNeal

    Thank you! All of these people criticizing the movie was ruining the movie in my mind. Basically, you just renewed my eyes to the awesomeness in the movie.

  • Rohan Mohmand

    Very well put, guys. Enjoyed reading it thoroughly.

  • K-Murphey

    I never thought the “how did Bruce get back into Gotham” question was that difficult to find an answer to. It is shown to us in the film that there were relief trucks and supplies moved into the city. It is how the special forces were able to enter the city. Couldn’t Bruce use the exact same means?

  • Geordie

    Excellent article, sound rebuttals to what are basically ‘nit-picking’ comments on /Film. I don’t understand why so many people actively look for any inconsistency or apparent mistake/flaw in these films. First and foremost, it’s a piece of entertainment and on that score it it succeeds on every level, if you want to break it down and look for perceived problems, you can tear down almost every film ever made.
    Prometheus has had more of this than any film I can recall, it appears that The Dark Knight Rises is in for similar treatment. The level of expectation is probably the main reason people are looking to criticise. As with Prometheus, that expectation was through the roof for this film, it was always going to struggle to please everyone.
    It pleased me, and it seems, most of the readers here.
    Good luck with the site.

  • Joe

    The biggest stretches were when Bruce banged Talia within a week, Blake KNOWING Bruce was Batman, and how he got back to Gotham. I read the original article and I thought there was a lot of nitpicking (especially Alfred’s last scene till the end…that was a fantastic scene). I understand the 3 complaints but at the same time…I assume Bruce hadn’t gotten laid in years and the rebuttal was pretty spot on. Getting back to Gotham while difficult wasn’t impossible (and honestly had Bane’s men found Bruce he would have been brought to Bane…instead of Bane/Talia nuking Gotham). Blake figuring out Bruce was a bit of a stretch…I understand he’s a very good detective…but a physical clue would have sufficed…without a clue it seems implausible…now had Blake had a feeling but had been bluffing Bruce into acknowledging he’s Batman…that would have been fine also. But it was kind of a bit forced…but these ultimately are small nitpicks to a great film.

  • SquirrelMG

    Completely agree, guys. I was tearing my hair out at a few parts in the /Film article… as you guys pointed out in this rebuttal, a number of things they had complained of were actually explained in the film. A few points of their’s I did agree with, though, but it was really enlightening to see this article kick that one’s butt.

  • http://www.slashfilm.com Peter Sciretta

    I could write a list of explanations to many of the issues many had with Prometheus. some of these explanations are a stretch. And most of them do not confront the problems I contributed to the original article.

    How Does Bruce Wayne recover from a dislocated vertebrae in 80 days without proper medical attention and with only a punch to the back. With proper medical care you’d be looking at a year.

    Its amazing that John Blake was able to figure out Bruce Wayne was Batman before Gordon, who had spent so much time with both Batman and Wayne over the years had no idea, don’t you think?

    Okay so Bane runs a prison in the middle of nowhere where he allows anyone who can climb out to escape? Wouldn’t he at least post guards at the top to prevent exactly what happens when Wayne escapes and throws a rope down to let the other prisoners escape? The prison is located next to a city, whats to stop one of the people in that city from helping those trapped escape? The whole concept is ridiculous. It works in a comic book but not in the grounded reality that Nolan is trying to create.

    My problem with Bruce returning to Gotham isn’t necessarily him getting into the city. Yes, we know Wayne Manor is located on the outskirts of the city, giving him the ability to get into the city. But how does a man with no money, nothing to barter with, get from a desert in India to the United States without a passport no less. These things are never confronted by your article.

    And why would Catwoman, a woman who can break Wayne’s uncrackable safe, not be able to use her skills to crack into databases and erase her history herself? At very least her abilities with social engineering could get her through most of it. A computer program called Clean Slate would never be created by a software developer, and is one of the worse macguffins I’ve heard of in quite some time.

  • http://twitter.com/Batmancanseeyou BATMAN

    I saw instant “criticism” once it came out. It seems the majority were Avengers fans. Avengers was funny a marvel fan boys wet dream. It too had flaws. But Batman and Avengers are polar opposite films.
    I wont get into Avengers because it’s a never ending topic.
    This film is not perfect,but it’s the film we wanted. Usually when people hate on something it’s because they are threatened by it.

    The ending of rises was perfect.
    Nolan basically retired Bale as Batman and with JGL’s back to us in the Batcave,Nolan was saying
    The Batman lives on.

  • http://twitter.com/Batmancanseeyou BATMAN

    1.Bane’s ex “doctor” helped Bruce. It was in the movie.
    (Plus,did we need the movie to be longer so people can “believe” he “healed” properly? No way)
    2.Bruce Wayne was a billionaire. I’m pretty sure Billionaires have friends around the world in high places.Let me ask Sir Richard Branson if this is plausible.
    3.Catwoman doesn’t know where the program is. Plus maybe she’s not THAT tech savy as other people. She’s not tony Stark.It’s why she was working with Daggert and Bane.

    4. Most people don’t care about macguffins.

  • http://twitter.com/Batmancanseeyou BATMAN

    Since I only saw people swoon over Wheadon, I never saw any Avengers “List of Negatives” and now Rises comes out and Avengers fans act like this is “Mars needs Moms”. or Transformers .

    Not just 1 negative article but several articles. We get it ,it has flaws and you hate it.
    But fans love it and appreciate what Nolan did with the time he had Batman.
    Sorry Batman didn’t have a team of Immortals flying around.
    t’s a Summer film,not the cure for dengue fever.

  • Hey

    nahh, this movie sucked.

  • Garrett

    I disagree I think Nolan wasn’t going for something as realistic and grounded as the dark knight or some of the things you mentioned wouldn’t be in the story.

  • http://cinematicimpact.com/ Travlis Hallingquest

    Well said Sir!!! People have no problem with flying Airships in The Avengers or Spider-man dunking a basketball goal from 20ft away and no one asks questions.

  • http://twitter.com/DukeD1989 Derek D

    Well no one can argue against that logic.

  • Brucewaynes cousin

    Blake did state it was a physical clue that gave him away. He said there was a look in his eyes and the way he walked and carried himself was just like batman.

  • Elgaucho

    For cryin out loud. Bruce Wayne left Gotham at the age of 21 years old and left behind his fortune and his identity to travel the world and learn about criminality. During this time he learned to survive, resorted to stealing so that he wouldn’t starve and became friends with some unsavory individuals in order to survive. He learned to be resourceful. It’s not far fetched that he, Bruce Wayne, Batman, could find a way back to Gotham from the middle of nowhere.

    Regarding Gordon not knowing who Batman was, the answer is simple: he didn’t care and didn’t want to know. This is stated twice in the movie by John Blake. Ignorance is bliss. If you don’t care about something and aren’t looking for it, then you are unlikely to find it. Also, Bruce Wayne is very convincing in his billionaire playboy persona. No one would dream that Bruce Wayne was the Batman. Also I wouldn’t assume that Gordon interacted very much with Bruce Wayne. Blake and Bruce had much more in common and shared a personal bond that Gordon never shared.

    About the prison, there’s also a simple answer: fear. Bane is a merciless terrorist. If he runs the prison, do you honestly think that anyone in the neighboring town would dare try and release the prisons and risk the wrath of Bane? He would torch the entire town without hesitation, and the townspeople would know that. And in the centuries that the prison has existed, only one extraordinary individual escaped. Even Bane himself could not do it. There’s no reason to believe that someone that he has just literally broken would be able to escape. Hence his surprise at Batman’s return.

    Finally, about Selena and the clean slate. The Internet is vast and contains endless number of databases and information. For one to try to hack into every database in the world, each with its own level of security that would likely need to be hacked, is an impossible task……unless there’s a program that does this for you. This program likely took years to develop

  • AJ

    The purpose of the 5 month occupation (without detonating the bomb) was to give Gotham false hope that they could still survive. That theme is conveyed through the dialogue quite clearly on numerous occasions.

    I understand Nolan intended to create a more realistic “superhero” world, but that can only be taken so far when your main character is a vigilante dressed up as a bat that doesn’t kill ANYONE.

    The suspension of disbelief is still going to be necessary to some degree.

  • http://twitter.com/DukeD1989 Derek D

    I honestly don’t really understand the criticism of him sleeping with Talia. There is like this assumption that sex=love, which is totally false. The guy had been “alone” for years, was in a very emotional state, Talia had just done a lot to help him, and if you are alone, cold and wet in a dark mansion with Marion Cotillard your aren’t going to throw her out, and what else are they going to do, play chess? People have sex, especially in specific emotional states. It happens all the time in life and film. And it wasn’t like they held each other all night, two love birds. Wayne was up and out of there the moment she feel asleep.

    With that I pretty much agree with what the article has to say. A lot of the criticism and plot holes, though very apparent, could be easily closed with a bit of thought on the viewers part. Like how he got back into Gotham, and how Blake had come to believe Wayne was Batman. Though this stuff would have been supported by more explanation, the lack of it didn’t really bother me. I mean he is Bruce Wayne, he got in and out of China and back into Gotham with an illegal prisoner in ‘The Dark Knight’ with no problem, I see no reason why with a few weeks he couldn’t get back into Gotham. Plus, it isn’t like Wayne acknowledged Blake’s belief that he was Batman. All Blake said was that given their similar histories, and feelings he has had, he thought Wayne was Batman. Is that a crime? People spend so much time wondering how no one has figured out who Batman is, and finally someone mentions he think he does and all the sudden it is “HOW THE HELL!!”.

  • http://twitter.com/DukeD1989 Derek D

    Also never understood the criticism of Bruce’s back. We never fully know his condition. One fellow inmate says its a dislocated vertebrate, but we have no idea the full severity of it. Was a few months too quick of a healing time? Possibly, but it is a film. Even if people want to believe it is Nolan’s more “realist” universe these same people are fine believing Harvey could somehow manage to be perfectly burnt down one side of his face, be in a hospital with a few small bandages even though his muscle and bone is showing, then be up and around killing people and getting into car crashes and be totally coherent. That is perfectly fine to them, as is sewing a bomb under someones skin, but Bruce recovering in TDKR is totally unrealistic…I just don’t understand their logic.

  • Elgaucho

    There can’t truly be despair without hope. That’s the reason for the 5 month occupation. To give Gotham hope that they could take control of their city when in reality the bomb is going to go off anyway. That’s also why he puts Bruce in the pit. To suffer a punishment more severe than death.

    It’s almost as if you didn’t watch the movie. This isn’t a popcorn flick. You actually have to think a little bit. Many of your criticisms are explained with dialogue. Go back and watch it again.

  • Samuel Mullins

    RE Bane’s plan and the purpose of the 5 month occupation. He says it. It’s right there in the script: his endgame is to destroy the city and finish of Ra’s Al Ghul’s plan in Begins and he is doing it over 5 months because he wants to torture the people of Gotham with hope and, by extension, torture Bruce. You might still think it’s silly, that’s fine. But his purpose is stated outright in the film.

  • http://www.facebook.com/peter.sciretta Peter Sciretta

    I’ve seen the movie twice now and know what is said, it’s just really silly — almost bond villainish.

  • http://twitter.com/DukeD1989 Derek D

    The long occupation was also to be an example to the rest of the world. I think people forget that their is a world outside of Gotham. Bane didn’t just want to destroy the city, though that was the ultimate end game considering that the bomb was set to blow anyway and that the trigger was more symbolic, but before he just leveled the city he wanted the world to watch as Gotham’s “citizens” rose up to over throw the “corrupt”, the government and the wealthy. For the world to see Gotham’s lowest citizens take control and for the city to consume itself for all to see. Ra’s mentioned in Batman Begins that they have tried devising new ways to cripple empires. Economics but that failed, mainly due in part to Bruce’s father. Then in the first film they tried releasing gas to make the whole city go mad and destroy itself. Here a similar tactic is taken. The league had no plans for the quick destruction of Gotham, and Bane and Talia’s plan very much mirror’s what Ra’s would have set in motion.

  • Nobody

    Where’s your article on “15 (lol at figure 15) things that bothered you in The Avengers”? Oh, wait. You liked that movie despite of fuckton of plot-holes over the one which actually gives a reason for every next frame you see and you chose to write about it. You totally earned my respect with your whiny-bitchiness, man. Kudos! :s

  • http://twitter.com/DukeD1989 Derek D

    Yes, but not out of the ordinary in the world Nolan created, considering he directed ‘Batman Begins’ as well, where Ra’s and the league already mentioned that they had tried similar, long term tactics before, and the very plot of that film involved releasing toxic gas to make the city go mad and destroy itself. People keeping using the terms “grounded” or “realistic” when talking about Nolan’s trilogy, but in reality much of what he has done, maybe less so in ‘The Dark Knight’, but in the trilogy as a whole, is still very much in the realm of typical “comic book” or as you put it “Bond villainish” plots.

  • http://www.slashfilm.com Peter Sciretta

    Again, I understand what was said in the movie. The reason is ridiculously silly, almost Bond Villainish.

  • Hustler

    This is even worse than the hack article you put out. Horrible arguments, if you can call them that. Just stop.

  • http://twitter.com/EShy EShy

    I find it amusing when people make more out of these films than what they are. It was really irritating when people were talking about the mythology of the matrix, a summer blockbuster sci-fi actioner that was just meant to be visually pleasing.
    In this genre, it’s rare that movies have screenplays as great as these batman movies did. The main goal is never to tell the best story, it’s to make the most fun movie and as much money as possible.

  • http://twitter.com/EShy EShy

    He also got back to Gotham in Batman Begins after 7 years by just making a call.
    If Nolan tried to spell out everything, this close to 3 hours movie would have to be a mini-series. No movie shows everything.
    how he got back to Gotham isn’t important. if it’s the biggest city in the country, you’ll have plenty of flights coming in from anywhere in the world.
    The problem with blake was that they did go out of their way to explain how he knows wayne is batman. so if you didn’t buy the explanation you might not like it (also, he says he thought he was batman, only when he sees batman is back, he knows for sure)

  • http://twitter.com/DukeD1989 Derek D

    I understand people maybe not personally believing it, but as you said, and I’ve only seen the film once so far (want to wait until audience numbers decline before I go again) I never got the impression that Blake knew for sure Wayne was Batman. Did he have a hunch? Did he strongly feel that Wayne was in fact Batman? Yeah, but no one, including Wayne, tells him he is correct. I see no issue in a character expressing how he strongly believes Wayne is Batman. it is not like when he did Alfred walked in with a cake and prizes for guess the right answer. Blake just wants him to know he thinks he is Batman, that he believes in him and hopes that if he is that he will return.

  • ShadyMilkMan

    It’s a superhero movie for heaven’s sake. I thought it was done well enough to invoke my suspension of disbelief. I didn’t understand how Blake got the coordinates to the Batcave he used during the finale montage, but I have a notion. Ultimately, the onus is on the viewer to make his own interpretation.

  • http://twitter.com/rgarg246 RAHUL

    this article should be shown to every critic who assumes to be a ‘critic’ and also be shown to the oscar people who treat “sir nolan” as not a great director but in the hearts of the people he is the greatest director of all time.

  • http://twitter.com/BoxOffice2 BoxOfficeFuture

    Great Article.

  • http://www.facebook.com/ryan.m.moore.5 Ryan M Moore

    I have found that there a lot of negative criticism when it comes to Nolan films in general. I found this prevalent with a lot of film snobs out there. I, myself, am a film snob and absolutely love every film Nolan has ever done. Most of these critics and detractors, I have found are in a specific age group, usually in their late 30′s-40′s. I made the connection with film school “teachers” I had. I honestly feel most detractors, who are film buffs carry a resentment for Nolan because of his meteoric rise at such a young age. What most people don’t understand is that every Nolan film not only deserves, but NEEDS multiple viewing. There are times when I look back at “Memento” and “Inceptions” and think, wait… that doesn’t make sense. Or, there’s a loophole in the theories that the film(s) relies on. Then I watch the film again, and all doubt is put to rest. Nolan is a master. Plain and simple. He is probably the most intelligent filmmaker working today, and there is not a single plot point or event in the film that does not fit into the theoretics or the rules of the world he has created within the film. As for TDKR, it was bound to disappoint people. The hype was too big. But I have yet to meet someone who has watched it that did not absolutely love it. For all the detractors who want to slam this movie for absolutely no reason, or knit-pick things in the film, just so they can actually say something negative about a great film, I suggest they take the time and revisit Joel Schumacher’s contribution to franchise, then re-watch Nolan’s film. If they have something negative to say even after that, they can stop watching real films and just stick to mindless crap cinema like Michael Bay films.

  • James

    Who cares about all the flaws it was a great movie with excellent acting and a great story. You see Blake finding the batcave and they mention that his first name is Robin as far as I know there was no mention of him being
    anything until he teamed up with Batman of course there is the mentioning of the flying graysons the acrobats. So that leaves only one question. But of course money talks , When is the fourth one coming out?

  • Nomis1800

    I cannot believe there were so many people who thought this were all plot holes. Are people really that dumb? All of these things are logically to explain. If you’ve seen the movie, you know how things fit.

  • http://www.facebook.com/matus.moska.5 Matus Moska

    Srsly these “flaws” in the film you guys assume to see in tdkr are on the par of when I ask myself that not sure if trolling or just retarded…
    My first question to you is that if you also see The Dark Knight as a film full of these “flaws”, because based on the logic you use, The Dark Knight is a REALLY SILLY movie.
    But lets look at what you actually said:
    1. Bruce recovering in 4 months, Bruce getting into Gotham from the middle of nowhere in around 15-20 days.
    All I can say to this is that, if we go by this logic, then every comic book movie is absolutely ridiculous. WHats coming up next? “why didnt some1 simply shoot bane in the head with a sniper?” HE IS THE BATMAN. He can recover in 4 months, and he can pass airport security and sneak into a goddamn plane .
    2. Blake finding out Batman’s identity.
    When Blake met Bruce he saw that they were the same, and he had a special feeling about him, there’s no need to look for anything rational here, Blake simply had an impulse that showed him the truth because he went through the same hell as Bruce did.

    3. The concept of Bane’s prison is ridiculous.
    Why would it be ridiculous, I think it was PERFECT. It was referred to as hell on earth, because you can see the path to freedom and have hope that you might get out eventually – although it is impossible. Bruce’s doctor said that it the same concept as when a man drinks salt water with hope that it will drive his thirst away and dies.
    Why wouldnt people from the outside help the prisoners escape? Would you help escape some1 who was so evil and dangerous that he was thrown in the Pit instead of a normal prison? I certainly wouldnt. And Bane wouldn’t put guards top because escape was considered IMPOSSIBLE, especially for a broken Batman.

    4. Catwoman the hacker.
    Don’t really know what to say to this. She cracked a safe, thats doing one thing. Erasing your identity from 1323153593291 different databases is something different I think. I think it was a great tool to show what she was really after and to give her real character.

    5. Bane’s destruction of Gotham
    This was already explained 902332 times by other people. I think that Bane’s plane was the most amazing, most well-executed villains plan ever made in cinema.

  • Nikhil Sunil

    Great article guys, but unfortunately you didn’t answer my biggest problem with the film.

    How the hell did he survive?!
    Yes yes, I know they show the scene where Lucius finds out that the auto pilot had been fixed 6 months ago. But if you remember from the ending of the film. There is a shot (seconds before the explosion) of Batman turning and facing the camera (almost like he’s accepted that he’s going to die for gotham city). This is seconds before the explosion! There is no way in hell he could survive that.

    Now, I don’t have a problem with leaving things open. But that really bugged me.

    Does anyone have any possible explanations to how he could have survived?

  • Falco09

    In that shot there are shadows crossing Batman’s face as if he’s flying past buildings. He’s supposed to be out over open water at this point, so the shadows don’t really make that much sense. I think that’s a little clue that he’s actually making his getaway in a different bat (remember we see at least 2 bats in the film, there could even be more) while the first one is on autopilot.

  • http://www.facebook.com/jeansebastien.pilarczyk Jean-Sébastien Pilarczyk

    /Film’s guys seems to ignore that editing is based on ellipsis.

  • Anonymous

    A very solidly written and reasoned article, though there is one glaring error. When Bruce returns to Gotham after his imprisonment, the film clearly shows Fox and Bruce in the Bat Bunker from TDK, retrieving a Batsuit and gear. It’s implied that he does not return to Wayne Manor (especially because the Bat is not in the Batcave, but stowed on top of a building).

  • Brad Sopher

    Or, similar to the tumbler which houses the batpod, maybe a portion of the bat is able to detach. Nice pickup with the shadows. I noticed this as well and figured the same thing.

  • Brad Sopher

    Blake even states that he and the other orphans would make-up stories about Bruce and how he could possibly be Batman. Then when Bruce came to the orphanage Blake was able to connect the dots. It might be a stretch, but its not that much of a stretch.

  • Brad Sopher

    Everybody wants to knock off the guy at the top. It’s the same in sports, business as well as the film industry. I find that most of these critiques are just jealous.

  • Brad Sopher

    Gordon said at the end of the movie, until now I didn’t care or want to know who the Batman was, but at that point he did want to know. I’m sure he could have figured it out if he really wanted to know.

    Only one person had ever escaped the prison, so Bane never imagined that Bruce could do the same, especially after Bane broke his body and spirit.

    Bruce Wayne is not only powerful in Gotham, but he’s powerful all around the world. He probably has any number of connections and could make one call to a friend with money. Also, remember that in BB he traveled the world with no money and was able to get around pretty well.

    Selina was able to change her identity, but couldn’t make it stick. That’s what Bruce and the clean slate offered.

    The had at least 9 years and the unlimited resources of the league of shadows to build this plan.

    Any other brain busters you need explained? Go watch the Avengers again if you’re not intelligent enough to connect the dots.

  • Brad Sopher

    You obviously don’t understand, or you wouldn’t have posted the questions above. Now get back on your short bus and get off this site… Idiot!

  • andreas

    for me, your arguements don’t work. yes, there where awnsers right there in the film, but they are really thin and never get me into the movie. i like nolan since I’ve seen memento in cinema, but thats his worst movie so far! too many inconvenient arguments and scenes and the epicness of the imax format was disappointing, too.

  • http://deltaassault.blogspot.com Delta_Assault

    “If the end game was to destroy the city, why didn’t he just detonate the
    bomb when he got it? Whats the purpose of the 5 month occupation?”

    You obviously didn’t watch the movie carefully, Peter. Bane spells out exactly why.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Andrew-Allen/7605503 Andrew Allen

    THANK you. Although I do not agree the CIA acted stupidly. I’m no intelligence expert, but doesn’t it seem reasonable that if you’re a field agent and you had an out-of-nowhere opportunity to get unprecedented intel on one of the worst criminals in the world, you might take it? Leaving the hoods on, yeah THAT was not clever. But that could be attributed to just not thinking clearly, which, big shocker, people sometimes do.

    And let’s not forget something: Bane’s plan probably assumed they WOULD un-hood them. What difference would it have made? None. The sky-jack would have still happened the same way. When he didn’t de-hood them, Bane probably thought, “…Oh. Okay. Whatever” and marched merrily along.

  • NolanFan

    Loved reading this! The film is truly a epic conclusion!

  • Jahanzeb Farooq

    Good write-up. I agree to some of your reasoning though I don’t think Nolan and company were thinking that deeply. I am a long time Nolan fan but I have to admit that I felt a little disappointed and cheated when I left the theater. Though it is still a very good movie (every Nolan film has a guaranteed 10/10 from me but I would give it 8/10) but all those plot holes and weird choices made it a lesser effort compared to TDK. It was more like a dumbed-down version of a regular Nolan film. Though I think those guys at Film are really nitpicking, following are the things that bothered me as well:

    -I found ending all messed up. I would rather have Bruce killed in that blast, and in fact at once I thought that Nolan has done that but then what’s the purpose of that scene at cafe? It seems Nolan has to do some compromises this time to make DC/WB happy. And by the way, in scene before that he is weeping in front of Bruce’s tomb and in next scene he doesn’t even look surprised enough to see Bruce there?
    -So let’s say that Bruce somehow escaped the blast, why would he want to live an anonymous life now? Why is he giving up? Does it mean Gotham is forever saved of any future criminals? What if someone with more dangerous plans than Bane/Talia comes in future?
    - How comes Blake figured out that Bruce is Batman? WTF man, this should have come as hell of a surprise. It was so abrupt, and I didn’t buy his reasoning. And at the same time, it made Gordon and a lot others complete idiots who could not figure that out.
    - I was so taken back to hear the word “Robin”, they shouldn’t even have used this word, there was no place of it in the realistic world Nolan had built. And as much as I remember, didn’t Nolan once say that he will never include Robin in his films?
    - Why everything has to be saved at the nickob of time? e.g. Batman saving Selina, Selina saving Batman from Bane, Batman saving Gordon, and of course Batman saving Gotham etc etc.- Same old bomb-going-to-be-detonated story. Could not Nolan have come with a better story?? There was no thrill or surprise there, every goddamn person in the audience knew that he is going to save Gotham. This and the above alone made me feel like I am watching a Bond, Spiderman, or any other commercial happy-ending movie, not something happening in the realistic world Nolan built in the first two films.
    - Bruce was out of business for 8 years, a very long time, but it took him few minutes to make a decision to come back to the business. It should have been a very hard decision to make but it didn’t seem like that at least.
    - Bane broke his back but it took him a few push-ups to come back in business. Come on.
    -Was it necessary to include the Batman-Selina relationship? The Batman and Selina kiss before he flies with bomb felt so out of place and shall I say cheesy, especially given that in the first two films Bruce was so committed to his mission that love and all that was never his priority.
    - Bane’s end was kinda lame, he deserved a more dramatic death. And why to make Selina kill him, what the heck Batman was doing in the whole film?

  • http://twitter.com/jimmyjames1stAD James Falcon

    I don’t think that what /film does it truly nit picking and some that had problems with the film could say the same thing about your rebuttal.

    Overall, I did like the movie and enjoyed it but it did have issues. Connecting issues between TDK and TDKR. I won’t use plot holes, but there were story dynamics that didn’t work, characters that didn’t have a reason to be there and to be honest, at times story, plot and characters were shoved to us to overly explain things that didn’t need explanation.

    I don’t consider TDKR a complete failure by the least, but the issues I had made it less enjoyable.

  • Anonymous

    There were 2 bats? Can you help me out with that?

  • Anonymous

    As a frequent reader of both sites (I love slashfilm), I want to thank you for doing a brilliant write-up.

  • Ryan Hill

    Great article. I’m glad you took the time to respond to all of this stuff. Some of Slashfilm’s comments make sense, but most of them just make me wonder if they even paid attention to the movie. TDKR is flawed, like most movies, but most of the so called “plot holes” in this one can be easily explained if you just think about them for a second. I feel as if Chris Nolan always gets more flak for his films having plot holes, and most other directors are forgiven for them. I guess it’s because of how acclaimed his films are?

  • Sumit

    Wayne ejected himself out n put The Bat on autopilot while he was still in Gotham city… that explains the reason why he was flying it so low after picking up the device… And it’s one of Nolan’s trademark to mix scenes in non-chorological order to confuse the audience… The frames of Batman in The Bat seconds before the explosion is actually the frame while he was still in Gotham n then ejected himself out… Nolan did it intentionally to give the idea that Batman sacrificed his life for Gotham.

  • OpinionsRISE

    This is 15 thing that DIDN’T bother you. Was there anything that DID bother you? just wondering…

  • OpinionsRISE

    This is 15 things that DIDN’T bother you. Was there anything that DID bother you? just wondering…

  • http://profiles.google.com/erictan2004 Eric Tan

    Well done, Nolan Fans!
    TDK also had multiple threads in the ending scenes…
    My only nagging question was: why eight years? Why not five? It does take a while to understand that Batman has hung his cape and cowl because of what happened to Rachel.
    There do seem to be some bits missing. Did Mr Nolan cut out a lot of scenes? Might he consider restoring them when he releases a DVD/Blu-Ray version?

  • http://twitter.com/doctormelack Andreas Nordén

    All these points pretty much echoes my thoughts, points that are are huge part of why I love the movie so much. Great article!

  • Sajin Raj

    Movies….My one and only love.
    She really mean to me a lot.Dont know how much. But just cant live without her.

    Had been a lot of time together. Precious.. Unforgettable..

    But first
    time we spend a night together…. And became one..
    It was “The Dark Knight
    Rises”.

  • http://leitourgeia.com/ Richard Barrett

    My hypothesis on why it was eight years: Batman Begins and The Dark Knight were shot three years apart but The Dark Knight takes place approximately a year after BB (maybe less). With The Dark Knight Rises being shot still another four years after that, calling it an eight year gap gives the film’s characters a chance to catch up age-wise with the actors.

  • BaneHardy

    Great article, I enjoyed what you wrote greatly. You’re right to call out slashfilm, nit picking at the stupidest little problems. They are ADvengers fans, nuff said about their stupidity.

  • Wasg

    It shows Batman, then cuts to John Blake, then cuts to “5 seconds” on the timer, then cuts to the Bat traveling over the water, then explodes. That gives anywhere in the area of 10-15 seconds. At the speed of the Bat, if Batman jumps out, that puts him possibly up to miles away from the blast, under water, to boot.

  • http://www.facebook.com/alex.sobaszek Alex Sobaszek

    In my opinion Gotham’s citizens could just think that Bruce Wayne became one of the victims of Bane’s revolution. A lot of rich and influential people were killed then, so no one connected his disappearance to Batman’s death.

  • http://twitter.com/rgarg246 RAHUL

    Happy Birthday Sir Christopher Nolan

  • LadyCat

    The rebuttal would be a lot more believable if NolanFans admitted the film definitely had it’s flaws, in spite of being an enjoyable spectacle. To pretend that there is a great, and perfectly-thought-out explanation by Nolan, for every issue and plot hole, for the lack of character development, for irrational actions/motives by the villains, and even the random details that don’t add up. Why is a single, out-of-place blood transfusion for Bane shown, never to appear again? Why is the stock market and all the trades not automatically shut down in the midst of a very public and very obvious terrorist attack? (proving fraud in this situation would not require “months” and “lawyers”!) And on what planet are “fingerprints” used for stock trades! Why is Alfred suddenly nothing like the loyal, helpful mentor he’s supposed to be, but a sarcastic, back-stabbing punk who cries in every other scene? Alfred should be helping Bruce train and overcome and supporting him – not complaining that he won’t make his own bed or insulting and belittling him constantly. Why is blunt force trauma to Batmans spine supposedly cured with more blunt force trauma to his spine? (Hint: by the laws of physics and direction of force applied, the vertbra needed to be pulled OUT, not pushed further IN.) Why would Batman make a point of telling Selina there is no auto-pilot, lead her to believe he is killing himself for the greater good, only to turn up a few scenes later taking her out to dinner?) And for that matter, why would Bruce lead Lucius, Alfred, Gordon, everyone who cares about him to believe he is dead, before suddenly turning up again? What the people of Gotham think about Batman is one thing… what his closest friends think and suffer through for not good reason what-so-ever, is another. I just can’t believe Alfred lost his nuts over Bruce being uninterested in dating, but was perfectly chill when he realized he went through grief, guilt and heartbreak in Batmans version of April Fools. Basically the only explanation is Nolan wanted to make a “twist” for the audience, regardless of whether it made any sense for the characters – which is lame writing.

  • jackjack

    I conisder myself as Nolanfan and this really are things that bother me about the movie. Some of us (frequent visitors and members of this site) find hard to acknowledge that this picture isn’t working in some important areas. Time will pass and show which of Christopher Nolan’s movies will be remembered as great, which as good, and which as (some people out there should consider merely existence of such a thing) poor.

  • http://dontloseyourdayjob.com/ Hassan Fvckry

    :: three thumbs up ::

  • TDurden

    Why Does Bane Take a Break from His Master Plan to Ship Bruce Wayne Off to the Desert?

    To add to the excellent
    rebuttal offered by this article, shipping Bruce Wayne off to the desert should
    not be construed as Bane taking a break from his master plan; rather, a
    strong argument could be made that doing so was in fact an integral part of
    Bane’s master plan. Bane explicitly mentions his goal of breaking Wayne’s body
    AND spirit. Bane’s first reason for doing so is that Wayne has betrayed the
    League of Shadows by killing their leader Ra’s al Ghul; destroying his spirit
    by throwing him in a prison full of (false) hope and despair before killing
    him can be interpreted as just retribution for his betrayal of The League
    (Wayne: “Why didn’t you just kill me?” Bane: “Your punishment must be more
    severe.”). But a more poignant reason for doing so is because of what Batman has
    come to symbolize. Bane’s goal is to finally carry out the original
    pursuits of the League of Shadows: to absolutely and unequivocally
    destroy Gotham. Had he so chosen, Bane could have easily destroyed Gotham the
    moment he got his hands on the nuclear device by simply detonating it. Obviously,
    Bane’s goal of destroying Gotham was not simply to detonate the nuclear device.
    Rather, his method of doing so was to first break Gotham’s spirit by bringing
    down all of its social structures/symbols and terrorizing its citizens. Only
    after this methodical approach would Bane allow the nuclear device to detonate.

    One of Gotham’s
    paramount symbols—indeed its most powerful symbol the world over—is Batman. Crushing
    Batman’s spirit is a compelling way that Bane choses to punish Gotham, not only
    because Batman has become Gotham’s guardian/savior, but because of the hope
    that Batman has come to symbolize. As Bane states after he takes Wayne to the
    prison he expects will destroy him, “…there can be no true despair without
    hope.” Interpreted this way, the scene fits perfectly into Bane’s plan.

    This storyline also fits
    perfectly into the Batman saga because Wayne’s escape from this prison
    ultimately serves as one of many themes that permeated the first two films and culminates
    in the final installment: hope vs. despair.

  • FilmBuff

    Maybe in the “hearts of people” who haven’t seen a single film made before 1990. Give me a break!

  • FilmBuff

    He gets flak for plot holes because he’s always spouting off about how HIS superhero movies are “realistic” unlike all the others… when you brag about realism but make TDKR as absurd as the most cartoony 60′s Bond film, you gotta expect some $#!t back from the fans who enjoyed his earlier, SMART movies.

  • FilmBuff

    Sure, but then what? Bruce Wayne is maybe 40? And still very much alive after giving away all his money and company shares… wouldn’t you say that’s a plot problem? You’re telling me he’s basically completely given up on his life, his beloved Gotham City, his family name, and decided to run away and give up his whole life because Gotham is “full of tragedy” and now he’s going to wander the earth in rags, or pretend to be someone else? Makes no sense at all to who the Batman/Bruce Wayne character is. And earlier in the film Alfred said the city needed his mind, not his body, his influence and leadership… but now? The ending makes no sense, Bruce Wayne/Batman would never throw away all his parents have worked to pass down to him.

  • Andrew

    WTF was the one random blood transfusion 4 Bane thing about? Surprised no one mentioned that as the real wtf moment…

  • FilmBuff

    If you have doubts about “the awesomeness” of this movie, there’s a good reason. NolanFans will of course bend over backwards in writing to cover for their idol, but the truth is Nolan is the one who should have worked a little harder in writing his script.

  • NoirLover64

    “Just jealous” is a rather lame excuse for enough plot holes to make swiss cheese. There are a lot of film critics who adore much of Nolans work, and hold him to a higher standard than TDKR mess because they know what he’s capable of.

  • IndieSpirit

    Well if Bane’s master plan is to be a cartoon cliche, ripping off every corny 1960′s James Bond villain that refused to kill the hero when he easily could just to make a grand speech and reveal his entire master plan … then he certainly succeeded. I expect a hell of a lot more than that from the guy who used to make SMART films.

  • TJ

    The real problem is the motivations of the characters make no sense. Bane has no plausible reason to hate Bruce Wayne or want to destory Gotham. Bane can’t be revenging the murder of Ra’s, because Ra’s (according to this script) cast Bane out of the League, treated him as a “monster” and sent him into exile, all for being unlucky enough to suffer some badly repaired facial wounds in the process of saving his daughters life (another point which makes no sense at all.) Then Talia aparently changes her name and identity and spends years executing elaborate revenge upon Bruce, all because she’s that angry with him (somehow learning his secret) for stoping her father (who she hated and was estranged from) from killing 12 million people. So I guess we’re supposed to believe that if Ra’s is unjust to a disfigured bodyguard, Talia disowns her father – but if Ra’s tries to blow up 12 million innocent men women and children with a nuclear bomb and dies in the process, Talia will suddenly change her entire life and spend the next decade making sure every last person she knows in Gotham is vaporized. Did I miss anything??? It’s the reason the movie falls flat on it’s face in the last series of reveals… because the foundation of the story is absurd and unbelievable. Nolan could have done so much better.

  • Steward

    While I love Nolan and his Dark Knight trilogy is by far the best of all comic book movies around, I did feel that there was something a little off with TDKR. It was a fantastic film and I thoroughly enjoyed it, but it just didn’t seem fully formed. I can’t help but feel there is a lot of “Nolan-goggles” going around. As though people just want to like it so much that they do, and refuse to see the flaws in the film (or choose to look past them) when in other films this would be used against them.
    Like I said, I’m not saying it wasn’t a great film, but I think people need to remember to look at it as a film, not at holy scripture.

  • http://www.facebook.com/callmeselina Kyle Selina

    The way I saw it, he may have landed elsewhere (the military would get in the way, otherwise) and come back over the ice. The ice is the only way through.

  • http://www.facebook.com/callmeselina Kyle Selina

    It was so that Agent Pavel’s blood would be in the corpse that crashed with the plane. When Pavel showed up at the football game, the CIA was convinced he was dead because his DNA was in the crash six months ago.

  • http://twitter.com/jprug Jason Prugar

    I liked this rebuttal to Slashfilm, who at times does seem to be a bit nitpicky and illogical in their criticisms. They tend to overthink. In any event, I am a fan of theirs.
    I may be playing Devil’s Advocate here, but perhaps they were all taking notes during the moments of dialogue that snuffs their criticisms? That’s the only thing I could think of.

  • flododom

    You clearly do not understand the character development that Bruce Wayne goes through in the trilogy.
    Also, they clearly say when they are giving out the wills that in terms of cash, he has none left. The belongings are sold, profits given to Alfred for all the things that he did for the Waynes and the house is donated to the orphans. The plaque of the orphan house honours his parents, not Bruce himself. It is a selfless act, and he has left his parents’ legacy in Gotham as well as batman’s legacy. He is not running away because Gotham is “full of tragedy”, he has left and started a new life with someone he loves, enjoying his actual life probably for the first time in his life since his parents’ death.
    Please watch the film again (maybe the whole trilogy, in fact) and pay attention this time – if you did not get the ending, you clearly did not get the whole trilogy.

  • flododom

    Also, Miranda used the fact that he was dead to try and convince Bruce to use the technology

  • flododom

    Ok FilmBuff, from the comments you have left on this page, it seems like you’re not a fan of Nolan’s latest works.

    In case you haven’t noticed, this whole website is called NOLAN FANS,
    where ironically, Nolan Fans come and discuss his works, INCLUDING,
    would you believe it, his latest films. We are obviously more inclined
    to like his work than normal film fans.

    You can’t keep complaining about how much this website will defend Nolan’s works, when it is a Nolan fan site. It’s like complaining in an Indian Restaurant that they serve Indian food only. Go somewhere else, please.

  • FilmBuff

    Actually, the reason I do not understand the “character development” because it makes no sense and is completely disrespectful of iconic Bruce Wayne/Batman character that has been well defined for generations by much more talented writers than the Nolan brothers. Your very first point is a plot hole – that he has no cash left. Lucius clearly stated in the film that they could prove fraud in order to get the money back, but that it would take some time. So unless Bruce just rolled over and decided he didn’t care about his parents fortune being pissed away, there is no reason for him to stay broke. Your second point is also a plot hole… started a new life with someone he loves, enjoying it? I thought he had no money, and was supposed to be dead! Will the two of them live of Selina Kyle robing rich guys, or will Bruce Wayne beg in the streets so they can keep visiting nice restaurants? You can’t claim that Bruce doesn’t have a penny to his name, has to continue to “play dead” to the world, hide his face from everyone in high society, but at the same time is “enjoying life for the first time.”

  • FilmBuff

    Has it occured to you that maybe some of Nolan’s fans are NOT happy that TDKR is his weakest film? There’s no law that says just because you are a fan of Nolan, you have to eat everything he serves with a spoon.

  • Andrew

    Dude, a blood transfusion doesn’t magically give you different DNA. Wtf… DNA tests of a corpse isn’t run on blood anyway. Do these guys not watch CSI?

  • Mike

    Well for the record, I actually thought all the stuff you mentioned was really stupid as well ;)

  • s_writer36

    Anytime a plot problem is explained with a bunch of “talking exposition” ie *dialogue* in a film, the script has serious problems. Nolan’s last few films have been full of expositionary dialogue and long speaches that explain things… goes against the most basic screenwriting/film rule: Show, don’t tell.

  • s_writer36

    Agreed!

  • JoeFannaras

    yah, Bane spells it out and it’s retarded even as he says it
    even the Joker made more sense in his crazy

  • Jordan

    Well in that case I guess Nolan should stop talking about how he wanted to make the film gritty and realistic in all his press interviews, huh?

  • Anonymous

    94th comment bitches!

    Give it up for mah boy Brendan.

  • rza

    thanx all nolan fans for such great support.
    but actually none of these items are important on the mythologycal way of narrating the story of good and evill.
    it just the way story goes and told to us. nolan show some part of the very big story like old epic sagas.

  • pavel

    NO. It would NOT take months to cancel the trades. First of all – the trading would be blocked right away, because of the number of transactions (system safety) and because of the terrorist attack. Second of all, the transactions would be cancelled, because the fraud was evident. Fingerprints have nothing to do with that.
    Third of all, this was one of the silliest scenes in the movie – hey, let’s greak into the stock market, and then USE THE MOBILE PHONE TO HACK IT!
    What a lazy piece of directing.

  • pavel

    What’s the speed of this BAT thing, then? Two miles per second? Interesting…

  • pavel

    Brad, true for the majority, but not for everyone.

  • pavel

    About the fights and non-firing. Just do zoom out, and you will see that it was crazy for the bad guys not to shoot in two situations.

  • marker

    what a great point! Both BB and TDK contain many instances where you must suspend disbelief but the craft is found when you don’t realize that you have this dissonance while watching! GO NOLAN!

  • raviraj sharma

    Yeah…. I guess most of us who are having Problems with TDKR are the ones who had very high expectations and actualy waited for over 4 years ? or so…. and at the end, received a Movie , which was at Best an above average Superhero Move with too many loose ends (or may be too many things left to the imagination) and by No means a NOLAN film…

  • Pingback: The Dark Knight Rises in Style, Part 1 « Curious Intentions Media

  • Pingback: The Dark Knight Rises in Style, Part 2 « Curious Intentions Media

  • Kent

    I absolutely agree that a lot of these are criticisms that should be non-present or at least can be explained with a “no-prize” answer. Or a Baldy, since we’re talking DC. Hell, “He’s Batman.” should be enough for a lot of them. But the character inconsistencies (especially Alfred) did bother me when reflecting on the film. And the Blake “intuit” explanation was utterly ridiculous. If they really wanted to show what a great detective he was and make him Bruce’s compatriot, all they had to do was have him explain how he had deduced that Bruce was Batman based on evidence (and not just looking at his face) and that he kept the information to himself. Doesn’t take any more dialogue, it cements the Tim Drake parallels they were trying to insert into the character and it builds him as competent instead of the reveal seeming like a huge dues ex machina. Of course the big one you skipped was the fact that somehow all but a few cops end up trapped underground. Gordon would undoubtedly issue a large sweep of the system, but there’s no way the “entire force” is going to wind up trapped down there. For one thing, the Gotham police force has to be huge, given the size of the city. Even at a time when there’s a low crime rate, there would still have to be a police presence to keep people from looting during the ‘training exercise.’ Number two, there would be have to be a significant number of off duty personel available, not to mention recently retired officers, that would return to duty. Instead somehow there are only four or five officers in the entire city that don’t get trapped? Hardly. That said, I really enjoyed the movie and I’ll end up buying it. And compared to Prometheus, its logic is practically air tight.

  • http://www.facebook.com/CuRecka Tyson CuRecka Curtis

    if any of u can remotely agree with this rebuttal…UR an idiot, u explained maybe 1 or 2, the rest of the rebuttals were in lamin terms,”its Batman” or ” its just a movie” terrible just terrible nice try but Nolan, this was actually Nolans worst moive, it wasnt a bad movie by any means but those 15 things kept it from being as great as TDK. 3.5 out of 5 stars .

  • http://www.facebook.com/CuRecka Tyson CuRecka Curtis

    oh and how did Batman survive the blast radius of a nuke??!!…u dont have 1 for that so please dont try at all it was a fail…yeah go ahead and say “its Batman” or its just a movie lol

  • David

    Outstanding rethoric and defense. It should be noted that people who generally criticize such great films do so without a general knowledge of the film’s purposes and most of the time without a propler analysis of the films’ elements themselves.

  • Name

    What was the people shouting at Bruce when he was climbing??? I l really like that part but I can’t understand.

  • Pingback: Too much everything: Dramaturgie und Charaktere in THE DARK KNIGHT RISES « indyfilmblog

  • stereobook

    Why did you write “Christian Bale and Marion Cotilliard have sex” instead of “Bruce Wayne and Miranda Tate have sex”? Just curious.

  • http://www.facebook.com/hemanthkr Hemanth Kumar Ramayanam

    Great read and excellent remarks on certain aspects in the film that is so perfectly made that only leaves us wanting for more…maybe a spin off with Blake as robin that revolves around the legacy of the Batman.

  • violinp

    It was to make people believe the dead guy was Dr. Pavel.

  • http://twitter.com/Cine_Capsulas Gustavo H. Razera

    So you know the Wachowski’s well enough to actually know their intention when they wrote and shot The Matrix?

  • Bruce Wayne

    The Dark Knight Rises is the most awesome #2 Comic book adaptation there is. A friend of mine was criticising the Avengers calling it epicly unrealastic and comparing the Lazarus pit of the comics to the movie. I told him that some of the stuff works with scince fiction and Nolan had set out to ADAPT the story from the realistic parts of the comics. Most of the story credit doesn,t go to him.

  • Richard Grayson

    Yep thats how i saw it -

    Avengers – what i wanted
    Dark knight – what i needed
    Rises – A pleasure with an awesome ending… However it has it’s flaws unlike Begins and DK….

    A friend of mine keeps on arguing that TDKR did a great thing by changing and then started a “Nolan is great and a dont give shit about comics” rant…. But i tried to explain to him that some things like the pit were orignally made in the 60′s (the unrealistic batman era) and Nolan HAD to make it realistic because thats what works for HIM.

    We cant compare Avengers and DK directly.. both accomplished what it set out to do,, but in the case of DK, many dont give credit to the comics (especially Nolanmaniacs) which is TOTALLY WRONG.

    Nolan deserves some serious props for Awesome direction and new additions to the Bat-verse… But the credit for the story and the awesome dialouges go to the comics.

    The site deleted my previous comment saying this. so i tell them – i’ll keep posting. U cant stop the TRUTH.

  • Scotty

    I have whittled down all of the inconsistencies/plot holes to only two: 1) The second timer on the bomb should have been fifteen minutes, not eleven. After all of the dialogue and exposition, even The Bat couldn’t fly the bomb to a safe distance in under a minute. 2) Bruce’s knowledge of when the bomb goes off is sketchy, reason being that he destroyed the prison monitor in rage and so lost his inside track. Also, Bruce had maybe five days to get back to Gotham after escaping the prison, which is somewhere in central Asia. This isn’t a problem; after Batman Begins, we know he can pull this off.

    Two lines of dialogue I would have changed: 1) The doctor telling Bruce how to escape the prison. Bruce – in his reawakened Batman state – should have figured this out himself. 2) Batman replying to Bane’s line, “So, you came back to die with your city?” with anything other than “Shut up” or physical attacks.

    Despite Batman being off-screen more in this movie than in The Dark Knight, it still felt like this one was more his movie.

  • sidoliver

    Excellent article! Just curious: Why did you put Christian Bale and Marion Cotilliard Have Sex instead of Bruce and Miranda Have Sex?

  • http://twitter.com/tinamouI tinamou

    Dude one site made observations, they gave well reasoned out counter arguments and didn’t defend what they couldn’t your own argument boils down to if you agree you are stupid, dude you are obviously the stupid one, you can’t even present a cogent argument.

  • http://nevermindpopfilm.blogspot.com/ Colin “Fitz” Biggs

    /Film’s list ignored quite a few points just to finish their post, thank guys, job well done.

  • Anonymous

    No, but it’s not hard to guess from the sequels.

  • http://nevermindpopfilm.blogspot.com/ Colin “Fitz” Biggs

    Bond Villainish? Like controlling the weather, or buying all the world’s media? Just admit what that post really was: hits.

  • Anonymous

    You’re over thinking it, Filmbuff. The point is he’s happy. Nothing more nothing less. But if it makes you feel better, like you said Lucius said he’d d get his money back eventually which would kick back to old Alfred. And then he can have all the money he needs.

  • http://www.facebook.com/anze.grcar.9 Anže Grčar

    Well, The Dark Knight Rises is the best Batman movie ever made in my personal opinion. Story is great, lead actors are just awesome and I have no problems with the plot. Christopher Nolan has shown to us the most innovative way how to end an epic trilogy.
    And I’m also sure that his version (or Snyders) of Superman will be as good as any of his previous movies. And, yeah, I hope he will make new James Bond. That would a masterpiece.
    Thanks Chris for pure entertainment.

  • cam_sol

    Guys, Come on. Heath Ledger died and they had to come up with a completely different third film. This is the result of that. Why isn’t somebody asking ‘What was the original third movie going to be?’

  • gervasium

    There is one problem with this rebuttal, which is the assumption that Bruce could get the batsuit at Wayne Manor, since that was the suit that had been destroyed, and if you pay attention to the film, the fact that he doesn’t have a suit is why he needs Fox.

    But he might indeed have gotten some tools, or just warm clothes with which he crawled through the frozen river. Or he walked through the bridge unnoticed. He has, after all, been taught “how to disappear completely.”

  • gervasium

    Or maybe he just walked, and we’re supposed to remember him fighting on thin ice in BB and doing quite well at staying up (League of Shadows techniques, maybe). The point here is that there are so many ways he could have done it, and it would damage his mysticism so much if they’d shown us, I don’t get the complaint.

  • Lionhart99

    Bane has a plausible reason to hate Bruce Wayne and to destroy Gotham. He fully shared Ra’s sentiments about Gotham and thus was driven to accomplish what the LOS had been striving for all along. Bruce Wayne was the obstacle between him and those goals. What you must understand is that Bane was exiled by Ra’s against his will.

  • TDR25_Forever

    One thing that I just thought about that completely disintegrates the whole finale of the film is when Bruce returns to Gotham and meets up with Selena, and wants her to help him find Fox to “get him back in the game.” If both Bruce and Lucious Fox didn’t know that Miranda/Talia was double crossing them at the time Bruce came back to Gotham, wouldn’t Bruce have come into some kind of contact with Miranda if he was looking for Lucious Fox, thus foiling Batman’s whole triumphant return to save the city? The whole movie was ridden with plot holes and things that should’ve been mentioned or shown in the movie itself.

  • Sleeper99999

    So, basically, Christopher Nolan is a god and don’t you dare criticize any of the Batman movies because they’re all perfect, perfect, perfect.

  • Sleeper99999

    Yes, but what’s the value in giving Gotham false hope? Why is that a goal Bane should want? Why psychologically break a population you’re planning to nuke? It’s an idiotic, nonsensical plan.

  • Sleeper99999

    The point is, what is accomplished by “giving Gotham false hope?” How does that further any of Bane’s ends or benefit him at all? He’s going to blow everyone up anyway.

  • Sleeper99999

    AVENGERS didn’t hold itself up as “realistic” and “grounded.” It’s in a universe with Norse gods and super-scientists. Nolan insisted on this gray, dark tone, and he has to follow through on that, he can’t just change it up and go ridiculous in the third installment.

  • KT

    This.
    This movie felt so last minute and thrown together, it’s a shame. A decent film but far from perfect and far, far from a classic.

  • Jacob

    Yes, the bat that is destroyed in the explosion, and the one Fox is having looked at later to see how he could have fixed the autopilot.

  • Daniel

    I am so happy to see someone else that actually understands this. Fabulous. When Bruce climbs out of the prison that is the first time we ACTUALLY see Batman. Conviction, belief, commitment and determination are what make Batman a superhero and in his fight with Bane he didn’t have any. That is why he got his ass kicked easily but after his back broken he still manages to beat Bane because he became Batman again when he climbed out. Seriously great article

  • Randall Appleby

    None of this would be necessary if Nolan brothers & Goyer hadn’t splooged out one of THE most convoluted, overreaching, disjointed, films I’ve seen in recent memory (Prometheus is the only thing slightly near this level of bad). The true test of the legitimacy of my OPINION vs this “filmic defense” of yours will of course be time, & ONLY time. I refuse to give a beat by beat brakedown of all my reasons, but I wil leave you with a closing statement: lazy writing is NEVER rewarded by the passing of time.

  • Kyle

    I just did a Control F for “recognize” and nothing came up so forgive me if this has been addressed. But here’s my biggest problem with this movie: Bruce Wayne is famous, world famous, and supposedly dead at the end of the film. There’s a tombstone for him, his will is executed, there was probably a TV montage on the nightly news about it… and he’s just sitting out in the open in a cafe in Europe without so much as a hoodie to obscure his identity? Nobody is going to snap a picture of him? Yes, he was legally declared dead before while running about undisguised, but that was before he returned to Gotham and became an active and oft-photographed socialite. He also was running around with criminals and various other underground sorts, as well as the most secretive society on earth: not sitting in the middle of a major city dressed well with his face shaved.

    If you were at Starbucks and Richard Branson was at the table next to you, you’d probably notice. The only way this works is if the ending is entirely metaphorical and Bruce/Batman really did die in the nuclear blast.

  • Amit Nag

    why weren’t the police eliminated?

  • t040484

    Or, maybe Superman flies in and saved Batman. We wait and see, maybe they will show it as the opening scene for Man of Steel. Maybe Nolan have something sets up for the Justice League movie.

  • Steven

    Then again, Prometheus was utterly bad, as a movie, poor motives, lack of depth, and people just tend to walk away in the middle of that film.

    Prometheus is not even closely comparable to a monster title such as The Dark Knight.

  • Steven

    Actually, i noticed Batman escaped the first time i viewed the movie, the last time you see a close-up of Batman’s face before the bomb blast, you can clearly see shadows or objects outside moving across his face, however, in the shot of The Bat flying over seas, there are clearly no objects around that could cast those shadows, initially upon my first watch, i passed it off as a filming mistake, only to find out moments later (in the scene when Fox discovers the autopilot was fixed by bruce wayne) that it was intentional.

    So, only to the very perceptive viewer, it is clear that by the time The Bat fly’s over sea, Batman himself is no longer inside, rather, he escapes with an ejection function that we presume The Bat must have had (like the BatPod ejecting out of The Tumbler in The Dark Knight) at the time of the explosion of the building (when Blake shouts “head’s own, this is it”).

    That explosion was likely merely a distraction to prevent him being seen ejecting out of The Bat
    since The Bat was not chased by anyone at this point, there should not have been a need to fire missiles, so the explosion was made purposely by Batman, as a distraction, to escape The Bat in the thick black smoke of the explosion.

  • The guy that HATES you

    “mythology of The Matrix”

    I assume you must mean Philosophy, rather than mythology, and it’s based on the Philosophy of being imprisoned and enslaved without knowing it.

    it’s based on the philosophical hypothesis of men that would be born and grown shackled to a wall, with a fire behind them, that would see nothing other than the shadows of themselves on the wall in front of them, and would not realize their own imprisonment.

    It’s not that people are “looking for things that aren’t there” it’s just that YOU are not knowledgeable to recognize WHAT philosophy underlies The Matrix.

    Your stupor, is not the stupor of others, In the optics of the idiot, the genius is unsocial, while in reality it’s the idiot, and not the genius who is unsocial.

    Same counts for you, because YOU’RE too dumb to understand the philosophy behind The Matrix, DOESN’T MEAN that other are stupid, because YOU PERCEIVE them to “see things that aren’t there”

    The point is that those things are in fact there, but you lack the receptivity to perceive them, and thus you conclude that they must perceive things that aren’t there, only because YOU CAN’T perceive what other in fact can.

  • Steven

    Very true, i also think the resentment of the orthodox film-fans is due to Nolan’s theatrical blitzkrieg.

    The sad part is that most of those Nolan haters, DO actually praise some of the most overrated, and shitty directors, such as Steven Spielberg (no offense to Spielberg fans but …. we can’t say that Jurassic Park, or E.T. or War Horse, or any of those other abhorrent films of Spielberg was anything even close to The Dark Knight trilogy)

    And praise, for example Pulp Fiction, which is somewhat of a nice movie to watch, but completely lacks depth, any form of depth.

    The Orthodox film fans simply cannot stand it that a Batman film series has overthrown The Godfather, and The Shawshank Redemption on the list of best films ever.

    The Dark Knight IS the best film, it’s just that it’s not yet accepted as the best film, because people have a hard time accepting a Batman film as the number 1, in consequence of the previous more laughable Batman films, who could not ever be taken so seriously or be regarded as ‘top-films’

    As time passes more people will have the courage to say their best regarded film is in fact a Batman film, The Dark Knight will steadily climb to the top of the charts as time progresses.

  • Steven

    Although the batman story is not from Nolan (obviously) He DID succeed making Batman films, that previously were filmed quite laughable, and not really memorable, into films that are to be taken seriously.

    The previous directors of Batman films kept the films somewhat childish, not really enjoyable for adults.

    Nolan did the opposite, Nolan made the films very adult, and they are likely too complicated for most children to really understand the films.

  • Gus

    Ok now let’s talk about the things that DID bother us about The Dark Knight Rises – the worst movie of the trilogy.

    Please double check the blast radius of a 4 megaton bomb. Just for comparison, a 15 kiloton bomb has a 2 mile blast radius. I also believe that such blast would AT LEAST cause some disturbance in the water, a few hundred meters below.

    Should I go on?

  • Agent Smith

    I would like to add that Wayne Manor is in fact in the city limits. If you’ll recall in The Dark Knight: Dent: “Is Wayne Manor in the city limits?” Wayne: “The Palisades? Sure. You know as our new D A you might want to figure out where your jurisdiction ends.” This takes out your main point in ” How does Bruce Wayne get out of Gotham?” Beside this fact I’d like to thank you for a superb article.

  • Richard Grayson

    So, the other moviemakers copied different books and Nolan copied a sure-to-be-hit one. That’s the only difference.

  • Stark

    Avengers is the best movie ever.

  • Stark

    Avengers is the best movie ever made.