Christopher Nolan Fans
Christopher Nolan Fans
Inception

Warner Bros. Wants An Inception Sequel

Posted on Friday, October 22, 2010 at 11:54 pm by George

inception sequel leo Warner Bros. Wants An Inception Sequel

With Inception’s box office sailing just under $811 million worldwide, this sort of thing was bound to break eventually. The Australian film site What’s Playing has an insider source that, after coming up empty on new Superman details, claimed “don’t be surprised if there’s another Inception though.” An Inception sequel or an original like Inception? The source clarified in a later response:

“…Warner Bros wants another Inception – as in sequel. Doesn’t make a lick of sense creatively, but financially? well… it made ”a lot” of money for them. Can’t imagine Nolan wanting to do a sequel, let alone direct one. Also don’t imagine Jeff would want to piss off Nolan by doing one around him. All interest is on the studio side at this stage. We shall see comrade…”


I imagine many would scoff at the idea of an Inception sequel, but it’s something that could make sense both financially and creatively. While Inception presented a very self-contained journey with the Dom Cobb character, the world Nolan conceived posed even more potential than it was given (so perhaps spin-off would be the more appropriate term). With so much of Inception’s dialog devoted to explanation, a sequel/spin-off could hopefully offer minimal and spend more time developing characters, discovering imaginative limits, and offering a broader scope of a world with dream machines. With possibilities in the air, the guys over at /Film came up with five ideas if another Inception does becomes a reality:

  • The Obvious Sequel – Cobb’s story continues. The totem doesn’t fall and he continues to try and get out of the dream world.
  • The Spin-off/Prequel – Tom Hardy’s character, Eames, is the main character and we see his earlier interactions with Cobb and learn more about forging. (I pick Eames out of everyone else because Tom Hardy was, obviously, the breakout star.)
  • The Twist – It’s revealed that Ariadne (Ellen Page) is actually the master, best extractor of all time and the first film was all in a masterful play of inception on Cobb. We follow her down her path on another mission.
  • The Obvious Prequel – We follow Cobb as he, much like Ariadne in the first film, finds out about dream worlds, extractions and more and slowly becomes the best one out there.
  • The Family Drama – The totem falls and it’s revealed Cobb made it! We then have to watch two and a half hours of family drama as he struggles with rebuilding the trust of his children who haven’t seen him in years.

These are the more immediate ideas that come to mind when thinking of an Inception sequel, and I find The Spin-off/Prequel (I agree that Hardy’s Eames was the most engaging of the supporting characters) and The Obvious Prequel to be the most appealing of the five. But what if the sequel doesn’t quite have as direct a connection to Inception? Something similar (and in greater degree) to what Duncan Jones plans to do with Mute could be pretty inspired. His 2009 film Moon and future project Mute share a world but involve different main characters and situations. Basically, another Inception film could be more like a fully developed, feature-length version of an Animatrix segment rather than a Matrix Reloaded.

More importantly, what do you guys think? Good idea / bad idea? Let the rampant discussion begin.



pixel Warner Bros. Wants An Inception Sequel

«            »
  • #1fan

    please no

  • Matt

    Not interested in a sequel at all

  • thenextnolan

    no!!!!!!!!!!!! screw inception part 2. i belive i already said this but,if a sequel does come through, I think Ariadne & Arthur will become the new dream team,seein as cobb would be out of the picture.they need a new extractor. we’ll,thats just my 2 cents.

  • http://www.nolanfans.com TeddyBlass

    Looks like Leo doesn’t like the idea either haha

  • Robert

    The concept of dream-sharing, taking out ideas and putting in new ones can have infinite potential of story ideas.

    I say we should expand the universe. Nolan said so himself that “like Star Wars, Matrix, and Lord of the Rings to cover such a vast universe, characters with history, places we don’t see.

    No more with the original cast, I think they’re too connected to Nolan’s individual, personal work and that the sequel should try to have it’s own identity also.

    I can imagine it deeper exploring the areas again, while putting new ideas on the table that would further expand the potential of dreams. For what is the most resliant parasite? AN IDEA!

  • thenextnolan

    i am kinda surprised WB took this long to announce a “possible” sequel. it does kinda make sense, considering @ the global box office, inception is currentley the 26th biggest film of all time.i belive this weekend it will have surrpased independence day & the 1st spiderman.

  • Jake

    Unless the original cast can return in its entirety, then no. Even still, I don’t like the idea and doubt Nolan does, either.

  • http://www.nolanfans.com AlexHaas

    I think a film sequel is a bad idea. See: The Matrix Trilogy.

    At the same time, Nolan’s INCEPTION universe seems too interesting to contain into just one movie. Maybe this is why the video game idea seems like it could work so well.

  • JDubs

    I think a prequel would be great. There’s a lot I’d like to see and I think it would be easier to relate to for a non Nolan fan audience.

  • Matt

    This is a prime example of a movie that doesn’t need a sequel

  • Pingback: Tweets that mention Warner Bros. Wants An Inception Sequel « Nolan Fans -- Topsy.com

  • Bryce

    A sequel/prequel? Are you serious?

    No. Never. And I doubt Nolan would want it too.

  • Zei

    Never. This movie is already perfect without sequel/prequel. And I am pretty sure Nolan won’t like this idea.

  • Cobb

    No. No. No. The first one is perfect the way it is.

  • sinception

    imo, a sequel would NOT be based on the top falling, actually based on Fischer recognizing Saito and realizing about Inception on his mind. again imo, it’d be interesting also if Stephen Miles was his trainer!

  • kit-kat

    Bad idea. Of course, I would love to see more movies like this (or Memento, for that matter) but definitely not a sequel, it’s just perfect the way it is. And I laughed out loud when I read that idea about the family drama, sounds like a typical Hollywood drama flick, not to mention that it would just ruin the impact of the ending.

  • Sam

    One is good enough.

  • Jamie

    Whilst it would be nice to see an extension of the world that Chris has created I feel that Inception was wrapped up nicely and that there is no real need for a sequel

  • dagn96

    I would not mind a spin-off as long as Nolan supervises. I’d hate a sequel

  • Slask

    Seriously.. NO.
    if Warner Bros wants more money, then they can let mr. Nolan work on Batman3 with the same freedom they gave him for TDK and Inception.. they could let him shoot entirely in IMAX (and not 3d), after all, now THAT’S the most awaited movie ever…

  • JW

    WHY? I think it’s one thing to have extensions of the story in non-film mediums like comic books, video games etc… A prequel could work, but I would prefer if they just left it alone. Just because there’s a lot of ground that can be covered, does not mean that it should be covered. You’d think that WB would have learned from The Matrix.

  • ThePhantomTerror

    Whatever it is, sequel, prequel/spin-off, NO MORE INCEPTION!!
    It’s perfect the way it is!!

  • http://Jaycificity.tumblr.com Jay

    Dear WB, You can still earn few more bucks with that Video Game idea (which really is a great idea), But the Sequel, BAD IDEA.
    (As if Nolan is going to aye that!)
    How about re-release, huh?

    And We do have (Will have actually) two great Comic Books and they will do the job of prequel for us.
    As Matt rightly put, This film is the Prime example of a movie which do not need a sequel/prequel and though, just like any other Nolan Stories, it’s endless.

  • N. Can KIRIK (j-joey)

    No [pre|se]quel will ruin all the success that Inception made. Video Game idea is ok, nearly every movie has a game now. But as a gamer i can tell, i’ll not play that game. Movie games just sucks…

    another idea, “Episodes of Inception” could be made with the same crew, that tells parallel stories in the real movie, what Mal & Cobb did in the past, how Ariadne learns to dreams, how Eames involved this dreaming stuff, how the army found the way to share dreams. etc etc…

  • shar

    Because I loved the movie the just the way it was, I really don’t there to be a sequel. I feel like that would just ruin the point of the ending. I liked that the ending was open to interpertation and making a sequel would prove if the top fell or not. I feel like Hollywood has need to make sequels to every single movie and Inception is just one of those movies that better left alone. It took Chris Nolan 8 years just to put this film together. I doubt he would agree to making a sequel because he would have to rush into making it.

  • Matt

    If everyone remembers that Nolan spoke of the possibility of an Inception video game that’s based on the world he created. So maybe this sparked some interest in another film. I highly doubt he’d do a sequel with the Cobb character because it would ruin the ending of the film and of all people I think Nolan understands that. But the prospect of another film based on Inception is not up to me or any of you. It’s up to Nolan, so just have some faith and besides it wouldn’t even start production until 2012 or 2013, so we have a long way to go.

  • Delta0Medusa

    No. Please no. Nolan won’t do another one and it would be pretty stupid if WB created one without him. They shouldn’t piss of a director who will make them billions in the near future.

  • Cilogy

    YES! BUT ONLY IF IT’S ANIMATED AND SENT STRAIGHT TO DVD!!!

  • rbevanx

    Just make a game WB and cut the crap.

  • EMIRC-DNIM

    No no no no no no no NO!

  • XYZ

    Please no no!!! Why destroy something so perfect with under developed sequels?

  • sickofsickness

    I am not on board with this idea at all, but one other story possibility could be to have Miles come to Cobb and tell him blah blah blah, and he has to come out of retirement for yet another “one more job”

    but I sure as hell hope nolan protests it publicly if he is against it, because if inception 2 does well, then we will have a 7 part franchise.

  • nils

    warner bros will not even consider making another movie if nolan isn’t at all involved, warner bros will immediately focus on the 3rd batman film and see what nolan wants and they are at the mercy of his choices.

    maybe 20 years from now when inception is a classic (if it isn’t already) nolan might add a sequel following eames or arthur (maybe ariadne, but probably not) but thats a long shot.

    i personally (after the next batman film) would like to see nolan do lower budget original movies again like memento and the prestige. i think that nolan is awesome with those types of films.

  • Sun

    I don’t want to see inception part 2
    because this movie is complete ending.

  • Jesse

    Cobb should try to shut down dream share because he knows how harmful it can be. He goes after the government and whoever else has acsess to it and uses it for evil. Or whatever.

  • ronb

    no its a horrible idea. the movie is fine the way it is, and hopefully inspires more originality.

  • vinay

    why not? i think a sequel would be welcome… Nolan created a mind f…k with this movie, he probably will do the same again…

    with that imaginative mind , he might surprise everyone…hes not going to make another movie just cos warner bros want to rake in the moola, hes going to make it because he wants to

    if he says no,, theres no way the studios will get anyone else to make the movie anyway.. this movie was Nolan’s baby

    if he says yes.. damn we all are going to go through that waiting and anticipation period all over again:)

  • Billy

    No Way! I don’t want!
    Nooooo!!

  • John Constantine

    it’s like the matrix. if you make a sequel you fuck up the original’s reputation

  • vinay

    actually, i think a number of you guys are wrong..over the last 2 days since this topic sufaced..a number of comments were made that the movie ended ambiguously.. i actually agree

    the ending was not definative so it has opened up the idea that there CAN be a sequel,

    its all conjexture anyway.. watch this space:)

  • christophmac

    Here’s why The Matrix went wrong: we didn’t need the story to carry on, the ending of the original Matrix was an ending to it all IMO. Obviously, the same can be said about Inception.

    However, I think that the concepts of dream sharing and the whole extraction concept is so incredible, it still has some potential to be filled. I’d only like a spin off focused on Eames though, because he was the only other dream theif who hadn’t been working for Cobb and wouldn’t relate the story back to Cobb, and who seems to have a story of their own that needs to be told.

    Other than that, I wouldn’t be happy – but I’d love a game.

  • Russell

    NO! dont ruin it with a sequel, it took nolan years to make inception, he cant just whip up another one. the sequel will ruin the whole series. and if warner bros wants money then BATMAN 3 is coming out-YEA!

  • gregb

    Nolan is a true artist who would rather limit his alientation then make a $… it won’t happen unless he thinks he can trump his previous effort a la Batman.

  • um

    NO!

  • Alterno

    No… a Prequel yeah!.

  • bboc

    I don’t want a sequel either but… You guys… It’s gonna happen. Accept it. Do you really think that WB is gonna let Nolan walk away from doing a sequel to one of the most financially successful movies of the year? Nolan is the hottest writer/director of our generation. Whatever he does is instant gold. They are going to throw a TON of money at him to do another one, or throw a TON of money to get all the rights to the project and make one themselves. It’s going to happen.

  • Naite22

    Leave it alone ! ! !
    INCEPTION should NOT have a sequel, and I’ll bet my life that Nolan will NEVER NEVER NEVER do it! So let it go WB!

    Besides, in many ways Inception was a pure miracle of filmmaking. Having another director trying to fill Nolans place will be bound to fuck up big time. Inception was one-beautiful-pearl of a a movie. We dont need a sequel, and I dont think most want it either! BATMAN 3 IS UP NEXT!

  • vinay

    I agree with bboc.. i think it will happen…Nolan will never mess with the original concept.. he will just work his way around it..and Nolan being Nolan,
    the sequel can only be as good, if not better than the original..
    Sequels can work, in the hands of a great director

    Dont compare this movie to the Matrix, The Watchowski bros messed the series up by trying to push it too far…Im sure if Nolan makes part 2.. its going to be a bigger, and better mind fu..ck than the 1st:)

    Besides it seems Nolan likes his blockbusters stories told over a few movies, like the Batmsn franchise, so maybe thats a good sign for a sequel

  • Cilogy

    Well Nolan is the owner of any rights to a sequel right?

  • Slask

    “I don’t want a sequel either but… You guys… It’s gonna happen. Accept it. Do you really think that WB is gonna let Nolan walk away from doing a sequel to one of the most financially successful movies of the year? They are going to throw a TON of money at him to do another one, or throw a TON of money to get all the rights to the project and make one themselves. It’s going to happen.”

    I firmly disagree… if what you’re saying was right, then Nolan would have made other 5 Batman movies! Remember when WB said they wanted a 7 films franchise? And what happened later? Nolan said “just one more, and then my franchise is over”.

    So, I don’t really think he’s gonna make another Inception, this is not rubbish like Avatar, which you can produce in series, this is serious filmaking, there’s no way Chris Nolan is going to ruin his story (clearly based on 1 single movie) just for money… if Warner Bros wants Batman 3 in production they can’t piss Nolan off, they know it.
    Obviously Chris knows Inception has a potential for something else, but he announced a videogame, not a second movie.

  • bboc

    @ Slask. I see your points. We may not agree, but I know we all hope they don’t make another one. LEAVE IT ALONE DAMNIT! But if they don’t make another one, there’s no doubt in my mind that they will go the Star Wars route and make extensions to the movie with all types of mediums. Video Games (confirmed), Comics (confirmed), Novels, TV shows, More iPhone apps, etc… They will bring out all the guns to extend the world of Inception whether it has to do with Cobb’s team or not. Time will tell.

  • vinay

    New POST:

    Nolan confirms he will be directing Inception 2. All original cast members sign up for the sequel ..:)

  • Pingback: Christopher Nolan Reportedly Meeting with Potential Females Leads for ‘Batman 3′; WB Wants ‘Inception 2′ :: THE MOVIE MASH

  • Jonathan

    No need for a sequel. Nolan’s told the story.

  • Sama-El Prime

    One word: DON’T!

  • Brian O

    NO SEQUEL OF ANY KIND. Not only are all of these idea’s listed ridiculous but Inception took a decade to write. It is a one of a kind, beyond epic master piece. There is no reason that anyone should attempt to create any kind of sequel because not only will the story never be as good but neither will the movie itself. Nolan knows better, he wont do it.

  • Aredt

    Absolutely ALL of your ideas SUCK; just like any other idea for a sequel would. Inception should be left alone. No sequel is needed. Avoid this sacrilege.

  • harry georgatos

    I wouldn’t want to see a continuation of the original story but use the dream technology in a complete spin-off. I would have the CIA recruiting this dream technology and hack into the nightmare/dream world of an Al Quaeda terrorist mastermind who plans on a series of bombings in New York.

  • JimmyFraska

    I absolutely hate the idea of a sequel to Inception. The story that Nolan told was wonderfully crafted o perfection. It needs to be left alone.

    However, it would be a crime to not expand the wonderful universe and utilize the potential the Inception world has. As long as a spin off with none of the original characters is made and it’s 1/4th as good as Inception, I’d enjoy it.

  • WilliamABW

    Honestly… I think Inception needs a sequel. Obviously, all of those website ideas suck, and Nolan wouldn’t dare approach them. But if Nolan really wants a sequel, I’m fairly confident it wouldn’t be a rough rehashing of the first film – now THAT would suck.

  • Terrak

    I hear alot of people saying the end is complete but there are many questions that need answering.

    Firstly, near the end when Cobb is trying to remind Sato he is in a dream state and they both realise they need to get back into reality why did Sato pick up the gun? We did not see them kill themselves. Being that deep wouldnt they need a very strong kick to wake up? What was that kick if any? Also We dont even see Cobb or Sato waking up through the dream levels like the others did. Cobb went straight to the plane. How? Why? This too is an interesting detail that is not explained.

    Second Point is about the totems. The totem in the movie have a specific way they work that only the creater knows. That way in the dream state when they use the totem and it doesnt act like it should they would know its a dream state. No one else should know the uniqueness of the Totem, and yet Sato knows Cobbs totems uniqueness (he knows hes dreaming because the Cobbs totem didnt fall). How? Im sure Cobb would be smart enough not to let Sato know that. After all Sato who knows about Dreamsharing could be doing exactly that to Cobb. Knowing the way Cobbs totem works he could make the Cobbs Totem Act as it would in reallife whilst in a dreamstate. This makes the totem effectively useless and could mean Cobb would never know reality from dreams.

    final point to consider is when Cobb tests the Chemists drug and wakes up he trys to spin the totem and doesnt complete the action, it simply drops to the floor when Sato interrupts. Interesting. Did Cobb Wake up?

    Too many questions. We need a sequel and a movie this great deserves one as long as they do it right. The ending complete? I dont believe so.

  • Terrak

    I dont think people here have much imagination. After thinking about it i believe this could turn out to be one of the best Trilogy’s of all time. Here is my idea of how Inception should be come a trilogy.

    First of we need a prequel to get things moving. It is necessary to set up several back stories that will explain the events of Inception plus explain the motivations for the final part of the Trilogy. The Name should be something like Genesis Inception 2 or Inception 2 Genesis, something like that. Obviously it talks about how dreamsharing is created and would give a more detailed account of how dreams are created. Micheal Caine is obviously where the concept starts dream sharing, maybe how to see what people are dreaming to understand them. However Caines (Miles) character never meddles with a persons dream, simply observes and understands which is how he treats his patients. He teaches this to Cobb, Mal, Arthur and Eames and probably some other people who can become characters in the third movie and explains other extractors that is talked about in Inception. Cobb, who facinated by this concept explores not only to sharing dreams but manipulating them. This is the key difference between Miles and Cobbs character and explains why Caine remains a lecturer in a university and no one goes after him regarding dream sharing. Cobb teaches this concept to the others in the class (behind Miles Back) which leads us to the love that forms between Cobb and Mal. They fall in love in the dream state not in the real world as they explore dream manipulation. This should be an important factor as Mal’s Character feels that in the real world her love didnt feel as real as it did in the dream world which would explain why she would want to be in a dream state with Cobb than spend a life with Cobb in the Real world. We would also explore the other characters that Cobb teaches dream manipulation too

    Obviously the next thing to happen is that the Military wants to use Dream sharing this which is explained in Inception. The Prequel should explore this a little more. Also the Character that gives Cobb the plane ticket in the scene where he is in his house should be a major character. He becomes important in the final part of the Trilogy.

    There would need to be some way Saito’s Character becomes involved in the prequel and need to hint on motivations.

    Obviously the tragic events regarding Mal’s Character need to be explained and how Cobb manages to escape the US.

    More development of the story can be made but this is the the basis. Which will lead to the final Chapter.

    Now with the last part of the Trilogy or sequel the main concept is that Saito’s Character is trying to get from Cobb how to get peoples minds stuck into limbo and stuck there. This is a weaponized form of dreamsharing. We find that Cobb never awoke from the Test in Mombasa but that Saito invaded his dream. The Job Saito had for Cobb was a dream. It would not be giving Robert Fischers character the idea to break up his inheritance, it would be giving the idea that Cobb was in the real world when infact he was in the dreamworld. Saito was infact learning how to get people Lost in the Dreamstate and stuck in Limbo, through Cobb. Doing this they could effectively ‘kill’ people as their minds are lost in Limbo, never knowing that they are stuck in the dream world. People in this state would be effectively dead. They would never wake up. No one but the few Dreamsharers would know what happened.

    Saito’s character thus is trying to ‘kill’ someone to get there inheritance from Saitos step father. Killing him by making him lost in the dream state would mean that no one would suspect Saito. Saito uses Cobb to learn how to get the concept of inception plus how to get lost in Limbo. We would follow how Cobb finds his way out of limbo and gets back at Saito and exposes what his doing. This will impress Saitos Father that though he cant get him back into America he brings his Children to live with Cobb in a new country in a new house, so he finally knows that he is not dreaming.

    These ideas are still raw but is one way Inception can become a trilogy.

  • Jackinthebox3000

    Just an idea. In the second movie, Cobb can be trying to find out whether he is in reality or a dream. The totem, he will realize, doesn’t work, as it was Mal’s before, and a totem is only supposed to be used by one person. After a long while, trying to figure out whether he is in reality, including a new technique of building a dream in which someone lets their mind truly wander freely, in which Cobb explores his own mind (this allows for some weird dreams, folks) with the help of Ariadne, Cobb decides that he is in a dream. Ariadne and him kill themselves at the end, upon discovering that other members of their previous team has been doing the same. The hardest part of this is leaving his dream children behind, whom he loves dearly. (Remaining members do the same as they kill themselves, in a nice montage.) Screen fades to white. Open to Inception 3: Where Cobbs is finally in reality. But all is not good. Upon arriving, Mal attempted to kill herself, yet again, this time because she could not bear living without Cobbs. As a result, she went into a deep coma. Cobbs, thus has to perform inception one last time, persuading Mal to wake up, and to come back to reality, all the while stopping her from having an idea planted that would cause her to kill herself when she comes back to reality. This complicated inception will involve level-hopping, in which switches between levels of the dream state will occur smoothly and in an almost unnoticeable manner. This can also involve skipping levels; you can go from a dream within a dream within a dream to a dream in a second while the third layer still waits below, skipping the second level. This effort will finally lead to Mal’s unsureness on whether to kill herself or not, unsure if she will really be leaving the dream, or dying. Cobbs will then say, ultimately, that it matters not whether where you are is a dream or reality, as long as those who you love are with you. They will then return to reality and their real children. But, in the end, Ariadne, who has been helping along the way to create the inception as architect, chooses to remain in dreamstate, forever, having found the real world too boring, she is, in the sense, addicted to the dream. The final shots are of Cobbs’ family finally together, and Ariadne slowly walking away with Cobbs’ dream children.

    That’s just my take. But honestly, it would probably be better if the movie was left alone. A prequel might be OK, though, as long as it was good, and Nolan backed it.

  • fro boy

    you guy should have inception 2 but instead of calling it inception .. call it extraction .and have it show all original cast and how they came to be such artists of the mind  by the wait my name  is froboy  #9542636009

  • fro boy

    you guy should have inception 2 but instead of calling it inception .. call it extraction .and have it show all original cast and how they came to be such artists of the mind  by the wait my name  is froboy  #9542636009

  • Jon Sutcliffe

    Outside of the possibilities listed above from the director—– I under the Impression of watching Inception Based purely on the ending scene alone— Understood that he awoke on the plane- confronted with the actual life counterpart of his final time in Limbo—- and that Cobb wasnt actually a member in any shape or form outside of Inceptions world even a member of the government—– And that the end was a final twist pointing out to the audience that The entire dreamt landscape Cobb had been part of was just a process of a natural dream and natural dream sharing— Also The way Cobb was at the end of inception looked like he was on a business trip—-

    So my mind took the series of metaphors and philosophies that were used in the imagery of inception- contrasted only to the end when Cobb woke up— that after waking from the dream that was filled with the self referential Ideal’s of dreaming itself rather than the governmental experiments and inception as a grandiose level of extractions or anything else—– That it was all a trick of the mind that The dreaming part of Inception was purely made of the mechanics of his own dream. 

    I studied Dreams in Psychology heavily Three years before Inception— and the dreaming process in Inception follow the exact Dimensions of the natural functions of Rem sleep within the cycle of dreaming as a natural Process
    And that on Cobbs awakening– Is the True Inception—- as he has only woken up with the left impression of all the slightly acerbic and seemingly absurd Potential of Dreamsharing—- In which Cobb’s Extraction process of the Son of the business Client was Metaphoric in the dream and allegorical of a repressed insecurity

    I have an Idea— a perfect Sequel that Plays itself out as a Prequel of sorts- Named “IntraCeption”
    Where Cobb attempts to relive the story, competing with himself to prove its possibility Which now has Been reduced from the given it was in Inception
    We catch him in the begginings of the film as we watch him alone and himself working the entire process out from scratch (Which I have In Scrap Noteform’s Roughly from My time studying Psychology)
    Preparing a whole process of self attuned psychologies and cognitive design’s trying to Map out– and uses of imaginative functions— all these being the experimental exercises that shape in slow epiphanies to an audience of an actual process as the first act of the film- One exercise being The active practise of the suicide that he would have to have to escape the dream ( A Self made Heart Attack)
    Intraception should probably a more darker and realistic effectual design- right up untill he plans to prepare himself for a first dream—- and rather than an Extraction Is purely the final experiment in the series- which he plans Based on the haunting memories of the first in Inception— Plans to to this dream alone to avoid the complication
    And the contrast between films Here is that In this time under his own fatalistic Flaws- Creates Uncontrollable nightmared realities- based on an underdeveloped and untrained (only against the first film mind) Subconscious

    Also— In the attempts to Avoid the Problems created by the process of Inception that he remembers from the dream he re philosophises it in places leaving dangerous flaws that only create themselves and materialise in the dreams- Being the first dream to Last five years only in ten minutes of dreaming- etc philosophies on space time and constraction to give of complete control and immediate though function to the dreaming landscape
    In which upon entering he enters a self made God like Paradise

    I can make the rest– In a synopsis if any of these early thoughts can Make a possibility in themselves for a perceivable or even Viable concept for a sequel

    Yours Verily
    Jon Sutcliffe